Skip to main content
Glama
PatrickSekey

MCP Filesystem Server

by PatrickSekey

Related Servers

Alternatives to MCP Filesystem Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A lightweight, stdio-based MCP server enabling AI assistants to perform local file system operations like reading, writing, searching, and executing commands.
      2,994 npm
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables LLM agents and MCP clients to read, list, write, search, watch, and batch-process files within configured allowed directories, while exposing discoverable file resources and structured error codes.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      The fastest, most capable filesystem MCP server built in Rust, giving AI agents superpowers to read, search, edit, and manage files and directories.
      11
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A local MCP server that enables AI agents to securely read, write, search, and edit JSON and Markdown files through a gated permission-scoped interface with configurable access modes.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A full-featured secure MCP server for local file system operations, with built-in image processing, OCR and media tools. Fully compliant with the official Model Context Protocol specification, offering standardized request/response schemas, large-file streaming I/O, multi-transport remote deployment, and comprehensive text search & replace functionality for LLM agent integration.
      22
      Apache 2.0

    TDQS

    B3.3/5.0

    Scored across 6 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools target distinct actions (read, list, write, search, watch), but batch_process overlaps with read_file and list_files by performing multi-file reads and summaries, creating minor ambiguity about when to use it versus the single-file tools.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All names use snake_case and mostly follow a verb_noun pattern (read_file, list_files, write_file, search_in_file, watch_directory). batch_process deviates slightly from verb_noun order, but the convention remains readable.

    Tool Count5/5

    Six tools is well-scoped for a filesystem server, with each tool covering a distinct operation (read, list, write, search, watch, batch) and no redundant endpoints.

    Completeness3/5

    Core read/write/search/list/watch workflows are present, but the filesystem surface lacks common operations like delete, move/rename, and copy. These are notable gaps for a general filesystem server.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues