Skip to main content
Glama
PatrickSekey

MCP Filesystem Server

by PatrickSekey
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to MCP Filesystem Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • local-mcp

      fan-67
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A lightweight, stdio-based MCP server enabling AI assistants to perform local file system operations like reading, writing, searching, and executing commands.
      1,005 npm
      MIT

    • filesystem_mcp_server

      RAJPUTDEE
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables LLM agents and MCP clients to read, list, write, search, watch, and batch-process files within configured allowed directories, while exposing discoverable file resources and structured error codes.
      -

    • Pathgrove

      elis132
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to search local files by name, path, metadata, and literal text over MCP on Windows, Linux, and macOS, while keeping searches within explicitly configured directories and running locally over stdio.
      7
      MIT

    • Filesystem MCP Server

      eeb16027
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides secure filesystem operations, including reading, searching, and batch processing files, with directory monitoring to detect new files, designed for integration with MCP clients such as LangGraph agents.
      -
    Deploy Server
    Shareable, User-Owned Context BackendPeople, applications, and agents read, write, and coordinate together in one context lake. Reach it over MCP, a CLI, a Python SDK, or REST.fulcradynamics.comAd

    TDQS

    B3.3/5.0

    Scored across 6 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools target distinct actions (read, list, write, search, watch), but batch_process overlaps with read_file and list_files by performing multi-file reads and summaries, creating minor ambiguity about when to use it versus the single-file tools.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All names use snake_case and mostly follow a verb_noun pattern (read_file, list_files, write_file, search_in_file, watch_directory). batch_process deviates slightly from verb_noun order, but the convention remains readable.

    Tool Count5/5

    Six tools is well-scoped for a filesystem server, with each tool covering a distinct operation (read, list, write, search, watch, batch) and no redundant endpoints.

    Completeness3/5

    Core read/write/search/list/watch workflows are present, but the filesystem surface lacks common operations like delete, move/rename, and copy. These are notable gaps for a general filesystem server.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources