mmex_accounts_get

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries full burden. It does not disclose important behavioral traits such as error handling (e.g., if ID not found), read-only nature (implied but not explicit), or dependency on database file existence. The description is minimal, missing key context for safe invocation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is highly concise: a one-line summary followed by clear parameter details. It is front-loaded with the core action, and every sentence adds value without redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple get tool with an output schema (not shown), the description is adequate but lacks completeness: no mention of error scenarios, required permissions, or performance characteristics. It covers the essentials but could provide more context for robust usage.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 0% schema description coverage, the description adds significant meaning by explaining each parameter: 'id' as account ID, 'db_path' with env var fallback, 'db_key' for encryption. This clarifies optional parameters and environmental defaults, which the schema lacks.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool retrieves an account by ID, using specific verb 'Get' and resource 'account'. It distinguishes from sibling tools like mmex_accounts_list which lists all accounts, making the purpose unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description does not provide any guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., mmex_accounts_list for listing). It lacks context on prerequisites or scenarios where this tool is preferred, leaving the agent to infer from the name alone.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.