A
licenseNot graded
qualityD
maintenanceMCP server for the Paperclip AI agent orchestration API, enabling management of AI companies, agents, projects, and tasks through any MCP-compatible client.
16 npm
4
MIT
Partiri Cloud MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to Partiri Cloud MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceMCP server that initializes, manages, and operates traceable agentic infrastructure across your digital ecosystem, serving as a control plane to know project states, health, and initialize missing setups.371MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for AI DevTool workflow, exposing tools and resources for code review, repository chat, and repository operations.1-
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceMCP server for hyperpanes terminal workspace app, enabling AI agents to compose and launch workspace layouts, inspect and drive terminal panes, stream output, and orchestrate agent hierarchies.471MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for Azure resource management, AI Foundry, and Entra ID — inspect and operate Azure infrastructure through AI agents.3MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for agentic task orchestration and management, enabling AI agents to create goals, plan tasks with acceptance criteria, track dependencies, request human input, and provide proof of completion.9 npm2MIT
TDQS
A4.1/5.0
Scored across 23 tools
Disambiguation5/5
Each tool targets a distinct resource or action: create, deploy, metrics, pricing, etc. No two tools have overlapping purposes. Even similar get_/list_ tools separate singular vs plural and target different entities.
Naming Consistency5/5
All tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case. Verbs are imperative (create, get, list, pause, etc.) and nouns are clear, even for compound terms like cpu_metrics. No mixing of styles.
Tool Count5/5
23 tools cover a cloud platform's essential operations (workspaces, projects, services, volumes, metrics, pricing) without being overwhelming. Each tool earns its place; no obvious bloat.
Completeness3/5
Service lifecycle is mostly covered (create, get, list, update, deploy, pause/unpause, validate, metrics) but missing delete operation and environment variable management (delegated to CLI). Volumes lack CRUD entirely. Projects and workspaces have only read or create. These gaps are notable but the core workflow for services is functional.
Maintenance
ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessNo issues