Skip to main content
Glama
Parker-Fawcett

rebuild-dossier

by Parker-Fawcett
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to rebuild-dossier

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • cc-agent

      Gonzih
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server that spawns autonomous Claude Code agents in GitHub repos, enabling task delegation with persistent state, multi-step workflows, and job monitoring.
      47
      187 npm
      2
      Apache 2.0

    • mcp-flow

      remimenguy
      F
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A safe, local MCP server that lets Claude drive a controlled software-development loop (inspect, read, plan, patch, apply, check, analyze, fix, summarize) on a project, using deterministic tools and real diffs/test runs.
      10
      1
      -

    • sove-mcp

      JrKrishh
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server that gives Claude structural understanding of a codebase—dependency graph, entry points, complexity ranking, and import cycles—without reading every file into context.
      4
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4/5.0

    Scored across 6 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct role in the pipeline: static repo ingestion, dynamic site crawling, recording a known bug override, listing unresolved cases, resolving a case, and generating the final dossier. There is no functional overlap or ambiguity between tool boundaries.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All six tool names follow the same snake_case verb_noun convention, such as ingest_repo, crawl_site, get_case_queue, and generate_spec. The verb choices are specific and the object naming is consistent, making the set predictable and easy to navigate.

    Tool Count5/5

    Six tools is a well-scoped size for this workflow, covering ingestion, crawling, bug flagging, case management, and final generation without redundancy. Each tool maps to a necessary step in the rebuild-dossier process and fits comfortably within the ideal range.

    Completeness4/5

    The main workflow is well covered: static analysis, dynamic crawling, human-in-the-loop case resolution, and final spec generation are all present. A minor gap is that there is no tool to list or remove previously flagged known bugs, but this does not prevent completing the core pipeline.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessWithin a week

    Resources