A
licenseNot graded
qualityD
maintenanceTurns a git-backed markdown directory into an MCP-compatible knowledge server, enabling any MCP client to read, search, ingest, and maintain a persistent wiki that compounds across sessions.
MIT
wiki-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to wiki-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables read-only searching, reading, and status inspection of a local Git-backed Markdown wiki via a minimal MCP toolset, without any network or write operations.Apache 2.0
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceProvides structured search, schema-validated writes, and linting for a markdown knowledge base, enabling agents to operate the wiki over a single streamable-HTTP MCP endpoint.1-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceA generic MCP server that turns a directory of Markdown wiki pages into a network-reachable knowledge base, queryable and updatable by any MCP-compatible client.MIT
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceEnables querying a Git-stored Markdown wiki by syncing, indexing, and providing tools to list, search, and read documents via MCP.5MIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceEnables querying and interacting with a Markdown wiki generated from Confluence pages, with search and MCP server for LLM access.104MIT
TDQS
A3.7/5.0
Scored across 3 tools
Disambiguation5/5
The three tools have clearly distinct purposes: orientation (read_orientation), discovery (search_wiki), and retrieval (get_page). There is no ambiguity about which tool to call for a given need, even though search_wiki and get_page both return page content, they serve different stages of a workflow.
Naming Consistency5/5
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern using snake_case: read_orientation, search_wiki, get_page. The naming is predictable and aligns with the action each tool performs.
Tool Count3/5
With only 3 tools, the server is on the thin side but not extreme. It covers basic reading and searching operations, but for a wiki server one might expect additional tools like listing or writing, making the count feel slightly limited for the domain.
Completeness2/5
The tool surface lacks any write operations (create, update, delete) and does not provide a straightforward way to list all pages without parsing the index. This is a significant gap for a wiki, as agents cannot modify or manage content, only read and search.
Maintenance
ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessNo issues