Skip to main content
Glama
PancrePal-xiaoyibao

Get笔记 MCP Server

Related Servers

Alternatives to Get笔记 MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI models to interact with the Get笔记 (GetNotes) platform via its Open API. It supports managing notes, organizing knowledge bases, and handling tags through natural language commands.
      24
      1,788 npm
      90
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables interaction with SiYuan Note through its API for comprehensive note management. Supports searching, creating, editing documents, managing notebooks, and daily notes operations through natural language commands.
      41 npm
      15
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides semantic search and keyword search over Obsidian notes, along with direct note retrieval, allowing external AI agents to query and access the vault.
      19
      BSD Zero Clause
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables interaction with Rememberizer.ai knowledge repositories to search, retrieve, and store information across sources like Slack, Gmail, and Google Drive. It supports semantic search and agentic queries to access and manage personal or team internal knowledge.
      Apache 2.0

    TDQS

    B3.3/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose with no overlap: get_rate_limit_stats handles API monitoring, knowledge_recall provides raw search results, and knowledge_search delivers AI-processed answers. The descriptions make it impossible to confuse these tools as they target fundamentally different operations.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The naming follows a consistent snake_case pattern throughout, but there's a minor deviation in verb style: 'get_' prefix for one tool versus 'knowledge_' prefix for the other two. This small inconsistency prevents a perfect score, though the overall naming remains highly readable and predictable.

    Tool Count3/5

    With only 3 tools, the set feels thin for a note-taking/knowledge management server, as it lacks basic CRUD operations like creating, updating, or deleting notes. While the tools cover API monitoring and search functions, the scope appears incomplete, making this borderline appropriate.

    Completeness2/5

    There are significant gaps in the tool surface for a note-taking server: no tools for creating, editing, organizing, or deleting notes, which are core to the domain. The tools focus only on search and API monitoring, leaving agents unable to perform essential workflows, likely causing failures in typical use cases.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues