Skip to main content
Glama

Server Configuration

Describes the environment variables required to run the server.

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
APIFY_TOKENNoApify token used as a Bearer token in the Authorization header when connecting to the remote Streamable HTTP endpoint (e.g. https://neeenja--vies-vat-validator-mcp.apify.actor/mcp).

Instructions

Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.

This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.

Capabilities

Features and capabilities supported by this server

Protocol revision2025-11-25

CapabilityDetails
tools
{
  "listChanged": true
}
prompts
{
  "listChanged": true
}
resources
{
  "listChanged": true
}

Tools

Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions

NameDescription
validate_vatB

校验 VAT / 税务识别号:先做免费本地格式校验,再按需调用欧盟官方 VIES 接口核验真实性。Validate a VAT number: free local format check, then optional live VIES verification.

check_vat_formatA

纯本地 VAT 号格式校验(零网络、零成本):判断号码形态是否符合该国规则。Free local format-only check (no network).

list_supported_countriesA

返回支持 VAT 校验的国家列表:代码 + 母语名 + 当地 VAT 叫法(如 USt-IdNr. / Partita IVA / btw-nummer)+ 中英名。List VIES-supported countries with native name and local VAT term.

get_error_codesB

返回完整的中英双语 VAT 校验错误码表。Return the full bilingual error-code table.

Prompts

Interactive templates invoked by user choice

NameDescription
vat_compliance_guide跨境电商 VAT 合规校验步骤指引 / Cross-border VAT compliance check guide
explain_vat_result解读一次 VAT 校验结果 / Explain a VAT validation result

Resources

Contextual data attached and managed by the client

NameDescription
error-codesBilingual VAT error-code table (JSON)
supported-countriesVIES-supported countries (JSON)
specService metadata (JSON)

TDQS

A3.6/5.0

Scored across 4 tools

Disambiguation4/5

validate_vat and check_vat_format overlap in that validate_vat includes a local format check, so an agent could wonder which to use. However, the descriptions clearly differentiate them (validate_vat adds live VIES verification, check_vat_format is zero-network/local-only), making the intended split reasonably clear.

Naming Consistency4/5

All four names follow a snake_case verb_noun pattern (validate_, check_, list_, get_), which is predictable. The only minor deviation is using two near-synonym verbs (validate vs check) for the two closely related validation tools.

Tool Count4/5

Four tools is on the lean side but appropriate for a narrow, single-purpose validator. Each tool maps to a distinct function (validation, format check, country list, error codes), though the count is slightly inflated by the overlapping validate/check pair.

Completeness4/5

The surface covers the core lifecycle for VAT validation: format checking, live verification, supported-country discovery, and error-code lookup. Minor gaps exist (e.g. no batch/multi-number validation), but agents can work around these.

Maintenance

ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessNo issues