get_plugin

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description explains the return structure (manifest plus list of entries), which provides behavioral insight beyond the input schema. However, with no annotations, it omits details like auth requirements, rate limits, or potential side effects, which are moderate gaps.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very concise (two lines for purpose, then bullet points for output). Every sentence adds value, and the structure is easy to parse.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has only one parameter and an output schema, the description covers the return structure but misses parameter semantics and usage context. It is adequate but not thorough.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 0% schema description coverage, the description fails to explain the 'plugin' parameter at all. It does not specify whether this is a name, ID, or slug, leaving the agent guessing.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool retrieves 'all registry entries for a plugin plus its manifest.' The verb 'get' and noun 'plugin' are specific, but it does not differentiate from sibling tools like 'get_entry' or 'list_entries'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as 'get_entry', 'get_entry_by_id', or 'list_plugins'. The description lacks any situational context or exclusion criteria.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.