Multi-Model Orchestrator
by Pakawat-Dev
README.md
# Multi-Model Orchestrator MCP Server
An intelligent Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that automatically routes queries to the most suitable AI model based on task requirements, cost constraints, and performance characteristics.
## Features
- **Intelligent Routing**: Automatically analyzes queries to determine task type (coding, analysis, creative writing, etc.)
- **Cost Optimization**: Recommends models based on budget constraints and cost-per-token
- **Performance Tiers**: Supports premium, standard, fast, and budget model tiers
- **Multi-Provider**: Includes models from OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, and open-source options
- **Flexible Priorities**: Optimize for cost, performance, speed, or balanced approach
- **Model Comparison**: Side-by-side comparison of different models
- **Cost Estimation**: Calculate estimated costs before running queries
## Supported Models
### Latest Generation Models (2024-2025)
| Model | Provider | Tier | Cost/1K Tokens | Strengths | Vision | Functions |
|-------|----------|------|----------------|-----------|--------|-----------|
| GPT-5 | OpenAI | Premium | $0.050 | Reasoning, coding, analysis, math, creative | ✅ | ✅ |
| Claude Opus 4.1 | Anthropic | Premium | $0.015 | Reasoning, analysis, creative, coding, math | ✅ | ✅ |
| Claude Sonnet 4.5 | Anthropic | Premium | $0.003 | Coding, reasoning, analysis, creative, chat | ✅ | ✅ |
| Gemini 2.5 Pro | Google | Premium | $0.00375 | Reasoning, coding, analysis, math, creative | ✅ | ✅ |
### Previous Generation Models
| Model | Provider | Tier | Cost/1K Tokens | Strengths | Vision | Functions |
|-------|----------|------|----------------|-----------|--------|-----------|
| GPT-4 | OpenAI | Premium | $0.030 | Reasoning, coding, analysis, math | ❌ | ✅ |
| GPT-3.5 Turbo | OpenAI | Fast | $0.002 | Chat, summarization, translation | ❌ | ✅ |
| Claude 3 Opus | Anthropic | Premium | $0.015 | Reasoning, analysis, creative, coding | ✅ | ❌ |
| Claude 3 Sonnet | Anthropic | Standard | $0.003 | Coding, analysis, chat | ✅ | ❌ |
| Claude 3 Haiku | Anthropic | Fast | $0.00025 | Chat, summarization, fast responses | ❌ | ❌ |
| Gemini Pro | Google | Standard | $0.00125 | Reasoning, coding, analysis | ❌ | ❌ |
| Llama 2 70B | Meta | Budget | $0.0008 | Chat, coding, summarization | ❌ | ❌ |
## Installation
1. **Install dependencies:**
```bash
pip install -r requirements.txt
```
2. **Make the script executable:**
```bash
chmod +x multi_model_orchestrator.py
```
## Configuration
### Claude Desktop Configuration
Add to your `claude_desktop_config.json`:
```json
{
"mcpServers": {
"multi-model-orchestrator": {
"command": "python",
"args": [
"/path/to/multi_model_orchestrator.py"
]
}
}
}
```
### VS Code Configuration
Add to your MCP settings:
```json
{
"mcp.servers": {
"multi-model-orchestrator": {
"command": "python",
"args": ["/path/to/multi_model_orchestrator.py"]
}
}
}
```
## Available Tools
### 1. recommend_model
Get AI model recommendations based on your query and requirements.
**Parameters:**
- `query` (required): The user query or task description
- `priority` (optional): What to optimize for - "balanced", "cost", "performance", or "speed" (default: "balanced")
- `max_cost_per_1k` (optional): Maximum acceptable cost per 1k tokens
**Example:**
```json
{
"query": "Write a complex Python function to optimize database queries",
"priority": "performance"
}
```
**Response:**
```json
{
"analysis": {
"task_type": "coding",
"estimated_tokens": 150,
"complexity": "high",
"requires_vision": false,
"requires_function_calling": false
},
"recommendation": {
"recommended_model": "claude-3-opus",
"provider": "Anthropic",
"tier": "premium",
"estimated_cost_per_1k": 0.015,
"strengths": ["reasoning", "analysis", "creative", "coding"],
"reason": "optimized for coding, premium tier performance",
"alternatives": [...]
}
}
```
### 2. compare_models
Compare multiple AI models side by side.
**Parameters:**
- `models` (required): Array of model names to compare
**Example:**
```json
{
"models": ["gpt-4", "claude-3-opus", "claude-3-sonnet"]
}
```
### 3. analyze_task
Analyze a query without making a recommendation.
**Parameters:**
- `query` (required): The query to analyze
**Example:**
```json
{
"query": "Translate this document from English to Spanish"
}
```
### 4. list_models_by_criteria
Filter models by specific criteria.
**Parameters:**
- `task_type` (optional): Filter by task type
- `tier` (optional): Filter by performance tier
- `max_cost` (optional): Maximum cost per 1k tokens
- `requires_vision` (optional): Requires vision capabilities
**Example:**
```json
{
"task_type": "coding",
"max_cost": 0.01,
"tier": "standard"
}
```
### 5. estimate_cost
Calculate the estimated cost for running a query.
**Parameters:**
- `model` (required): Model name
- `input_tokens` (required): Estimated input tokens
- `output_tokens` (required): Estimated output tokens
**Example:**
```json
{
"model": "claude-3-sonnet",
"input_tokens": 500,
"output_tokens": 1000
}
```
## Usage Examples
### Example 1: Cost-Optimized Query
```python
# Query: "Summarize this article in 3 bullet points"
# Priority: cost
# Result: claude-3-haiku (lowest cost, optimized for summarization)
```
### Example 2: Performance-Optimized Complex Task
```python
# Query: "Analyze this codebase and suggest architectural improvements"
# Priority: performance
# Result: gpt-4 or claude-3-opus (premium tier, strong reasoning)
```
### Example 3: Speed-Optimized Simple Chat
```python
# Query: "What's the weather like?"
# Priority: speed
# Result: gpt-3.5-turbo or claude-3-haiku (fast response)
```
### Example 4: Budget Constraint
```python
# Query: "Write a blog post about AI"
# Priority: balanced
# max_cost_per_1k: 0.005
# Result: claude-3-sonnet or gemini-pro (within budget, good quality)
```
## Task Type Detection
The orchestrator automatically detects task types:
- **Coding**: Keywords like "code", "function", "debug", "programming"
- **Analysis**: Keywords like "analyze", "compare", "evaluate"
- **Creative**: Keywords like "write", "story", "poem", "creative"
- **Math**: Keywords like "calculate", "math", "solve"
- **Translation**: Keywords like "translate", "translation"
- **Summarization**: Keywords like "summarize", "summary", "brief"
- **Reasoning**: Keywords like "reasoning", "logic", "explain why"
- **Chat**: Default for general conversation
## Resources
The server provides two resources:
1. **models://catalog** - Complete model catalog with capabilities
2. **models://routing-rules** - Current routing rules and logic
## Customization
### Adding New Models
Edit the `MODELS` dictionary in `multi_model_orchestrator.py`:
```python
MODELS = {
"your-model-name": ModelInfo(
name="your-model-name",
provider="YourProvider",
tier=ModelTier.STANDARD,
cost_per_1k_tokens=0.005,
strengths=["coding", "analysis"],
max_tokens=8192,
supports_vision=False,
supports_function_calling=True
)
}
```
### Adjusting Routing Logic
Modify the `recommend_model()` method to adjust scoring:
```python
# Increase weight for task type matching
if task_type.value in model_info.strengths:
score += 50 # Adjust this value
```
## Architecture
```
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ MCP Client (Claude Desktop) │
└────────────────────┬────────────────────────────┘
│
│ MCP Protocol
│
┌────────────────────▼────────────────────────────┐
│ Multi-Model Orchestrator Server │
│ │
│ ┌────────────────────────────────────────┐ │
│ │ Query Analysis Engine │ │
│ │ - Task type detection │ │
│ │ - Complexity assessment │ │
│ │ - Requirement extraction │ │
│ └────────────────────────────────────────┘ │
│ │
│ ┌────────────────────────────────────────┐ │
│ │ Model Recommendation Engine │ │
│ │ - Score-based selection │ │
│ │ - Cost optimization │ │
│ │ - Performance matching │ │
│ └────────────────────────────────────────┘ │
│ │
│ ┌────────────────────────────────────────┐ │
│ │ Model Database │ │
│ │ - Capabilities │ │
│ │ - Costs │ │
│ │ - Performance tiers │ │
│ └────────────────────────────────────────┘ │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
```
## Future Enhancements
- [ ] Real-time cost tracking
- [ ] Usage analytics and reporting
- [ ] A/B testing between models
- [ ] Custom routing rules via configuration
- [ ] Integration with actual API providers
- [ ] Model performance benchmarking
- [ ] Historical query analysis
- [ ] Rate limiting support
- [ ] Multi-model ensemble responses
## Testing
Test the server manually:
```bash
# Run the server
python multi_model_orchestrator.py
# In another terminal, test with MCP Inspector
npx @modelcontextprotocol/inspector python multi_model_orchestrator.py
```
## Troubleshooting
### Server won't start
- Ensure Python 3.10+ is installed
- Check that all dependencies are installed: `pip install -r requirements.txt`
- Verify the script path in your configuration
### No models recommended
- Check that your query is being analyzed correctly
- Try different priority modes
- Verify max_cost constraints aren't too restrictive
### Tool calls failing
- Ensure proper JSON format for parameters
- Check the MCP client logs for detailed error messages
## Contributing
To extend this MCP server:
1. Add new models to the `MODELS` dictionary
2. Enhance task type detection in `analyze_query()`
3. Adjust scoring logic in `recommend_model()`
4. Add new tools to handle additional use cases
## License
MIT License - Feel free to use and modify for your needs.
## Author
Created as a demonstration of MCP server capabilities for intelligent model routing.
---
**Note**: This is a routing and recommendation tool. It does not actually call the AI model APIs. You would need to integrate with the respective provider SDKs to execute queries on the recommended models.
This server cannot be deployed
Maintenance
ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues