OpenCOOP MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to OpenCOOP MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables multiple coding agents to collaborate in a shared workspace with roles, messaging, concurrent file editing, task graphs, and live awareness of each other.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables two developers using Claude Code to collaborate in real time on the same codebase, with file locking, guest write approvals, and secure session joining. It connects host and guest Claude Code sessions to a shared project with tools for file operations, locks, and notifications.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables multiple AI agents like Claude and Codex to coordinate on the same project through shared tasks, file locks, and a real-time dashboard, preventing conflicts and streamlining collaborative development.8 npm1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables multi-agent and human collaboration through MCP with scoped rooms, invites, @mentions, task claims, file locks, and push delivery to Claude Code, Codex, and Cursor. Provides cross-company safety, human review, and MCP/A2A protocols for coordinated agent work.22 npmApache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables separate Claude Code sessions across a team to see teammates' live presence, warn before editing a file someone else is editing, route shared-contract changes to the developers whose code depends on them, and produce structured handoffs when a session ends.201 npm1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables multiple AI agents using MCP-compatible clients to collaborate in parallel on the same project across one or more machines, with direct messaging, a shared task board, atomic file/folder locking, presence tracking, and a live web dashboard.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 17 tools
Most tools have clear, distinct purposes (e.g., read vs. write vs. edit, search_files by name vs. grep_content by content). The only potential confusion is between list_files and directory_tree, but their descriptions clarify the difference.
Tool names mostly follow a verb_noun pattern (list_members, lock_file, invite_member). The main deviations are directory_tree and who_is_online, which break the pattern slightly but are still readable and predictable.
17 tools is on the higher end but appropriate for a collaborative file-sharing server covering file operations, locking, member management, and activity views. No tool feels redundant or excessive.
The surface covers file read/write/edit/list/search, locking, member management, and activity well. However, there is no delete_file tool, and member permissions cannot be updated, which are notable gaps for a full collaboration lifecycle.