Skip to main content
Glama
OpenCOOP MCP Server

OpenCOOP MCP Server

by Pajand

Related Servers

Alternatives to OpenCOOP MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables multiple coding agents to collaborate in a shared workspace with roles, messaging, concurrent file editing, task graphs, and live awareness of each other.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables two developers using Claude Code to collaborate in real time on the same codebase, with file locking, guest write approvals, and secure session joining. It connects host and guest Claude Code sessions to a shared project with tools for file operations, locks, and notifications.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables multiple AI agents like Claude and Codex to coordinate on the same project through shared tasks, file locks, and a real-time dashboard, preventing conflicts and streamlining collaborative development.
      2 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables multi-agent and human collaboration through MCP with scoped rooms, invites, @mentions, task claims, file locks, and push delivery to Claude Code, Codex, and Cursor. Provides cross-company safety, human review, and MCP/A2A protocols for coordinated agent work.
      12 npm
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables separate Claude Code sessions across a team to see teammates' live presence, warn before editing a file someone else is editing, route shared-contract changes to the developers whose code depends on them, and produce structured handoffs when a session ends.
      261 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables multiple AI agents using MCP-compatible clients to collaborate in parallel on the same project across one or more machines, with direct messaging, a shared task board, atomic file/folder locking, presence tracking, and a live web dashboard.
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 20 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct action or resource: file CRUD, lock management, snapshot rollback, project views, team administration, and a guide. Related tools like check_lock vs. list_locks and list_members vs. who_is_online have clearly separated scopes. No two tools appear to do the same thing.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most names follow a predictable verb_noun snake_case pattern (read_file, lock_file, list_snapshots, invite_member). There are a few minor deviations such as who_is_online, directory_tree, and opencoop_guide, but the set remains readable and mostly consistent.

    Tool Count4/5

    At 20 tools, the set is on the heavier side but each tool maps to a meaningful collaboration operation. File operations, locking, snapshots, team management, and project visibility all justify their own tools. It is slightly expansive but not bloated.

    Completeness3/5

    The file lifecycle covers read, write, edit, list, and search, plus robust lock and rollback support. However, obvious file operations such as delete and move/rename are missing, and there is no explicit snapshot creation or diff operation. These are notable gaps in an otherwise broad collaboration surface.

    Maintenance

    ActivityNo data
    ResponsivenessOutdated data