Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
PaddyAlton

gotask-mcp

by PaddyAlton
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to gotask-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • RTaskmaster MCP

      RagnarPitla
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A task management MCP server for AI-driven development, enabling creation, tracking, and organization of tasks with subtasks, priorities, and dependencies via natural language commands.
      13
      6 npm
      MIT

    • questlog-mcp

      JoeyMckenzie
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that wraps the Taskwarrior CLI to allow AI assistants to create, query, modify, and manage tasks directly from agentic coding tools.
      8 npm
      MIT

    • Agent Standup

      Zaida-3dO
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      An MCP server enabling AI coding agents to interact with a task tracker that enforces rules server-side, replacing markdown files and hooks with a database, CLI, and web UI.
      23 npm
      2
      MIT

    • Agentic Terminal

      mohamedmahmoud8801
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that gives AI agents terminal execution, Python scripting, file management, and code search tools so they can carry out real development tasks. It exposes bash, Python, glob, grep, and file/folder operations over MCP for coding assistants and codebase exploration.
      9
      1
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    Shareable, User-Owned Context BackendPeople, applications, and agents read, write, and coordinate together in one context lake. Reach it over MCP, a CLI, a Python SDK, or REST.fulcradynamics.comAd

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: listing tasks and running a specific task. There is no overlap in functionality, so an agent can easily distinguish them.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Both names use underscores, but one follows a verb_noun pattern (run_task) while the other uses noun_verb (task_list). This slight inconsistency could be confusing with more tools, but for two tools it remains clear.

    Tool Count3/5

    With only two tools, the surface is thin for a task management server. While it covers the basic operations of listing and running, the count is at the lower end of acceptability.

    Completeness3/5

    The server lacks task creation, update, and deletion capabilities, which are typical for managing tasks. For a complete workflow, these are notable omissions, though the server may be intended solely for execution.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources