get_parameter_details

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the behavioral burden. It discloses the kinds of information returned (technical details, type, defaults, examples, performance notes) and 'Obtiene' implies a read-only lookup, but it does not explicitly state side effects, permissions, or rate-limit behavior.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, front-loaded sentence with no filler. It efficiently packs the return content categories without redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple read-only getter with one documented parameter and no output schema, the description is largely complete: it says what will be returned. It falls short only by not routing the agent to alternatives for discovering parameter names or validating them.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

There is one parameter and schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents the 'name' parameter including examples. The description adds no syntax, format, or naming constraints beyond what the schema provides, making the baseline 3 appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb ('Obtiene') and resource ('información técnica detallada ... de un parámetro específico del motor'). The phrase 'un parámetro específico' distinguishes it from the sibling 'list_engine_parameters', which would enumerate parameters rather than detail one.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Usage is implied: call this when you already know the name of a specific engine parameter and need details about it. However, the description does not explicitly say when to use this versus siblings such as 'list_engine_parameters', 'validate_anime_code', or 'register_parameter'.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.