sarup
by PHUICMT
README.md
<!-- mcp-name: io.github.PHUICMT/sarup -->
<div align="center">
# สรุป · Sarup
**Thai-first context compression for Claude Code.**
An MCP server that actually shrinks Thai (50–78% fewer tokens) and caches every original
so nothing is ever lost. Measured for what matters too: whether Claude still answers correctly.
[](https://github.com/PHUICMT/sarup/actions/workflows/ci.yml)
[](https://pypi.org/project/sarup/)




<!--
Quickstart demo GIF goes here. To record one:
1) asciinema rec demo.cast (or: terminalizer record demo)
2) agg demo.cast docs/quickstart.gif (asciinema -> gif)
3) uncomment the line below and commit docs/quickstart.gif
-->
<!--  -->
</div>
> *สรุป* means "to summarize." Headroom routes Thai through `noop` (0% savings) because its
> whitespace tokenizer can't find Thai word boundaries. Sarup uses PyThaiNLP segmentation, so it
> compresses Thai as well as English — and caches every original so nothing is ever lost.
## Contents
- [Highlights](#highlights)
- [Why it's safe — the two-tier guarantee](#why-its-safe--the-two-tier-guarantee)
- [How it works](#how-it-works)
- [Tools](#tools)
- [Compression modes](#compression-modes)
- [Measured results](#measured-results)
- [Example](#example)
- [Install](#install)
- [Register with Claude Code](#register-with-claude-code)
- [Auto-compression hook](#auto-compression-hook)
- [Privacy & data](#privacy--data)
- [Configuration](#configuration)
- [Project structure](#project-structure)
- [Tech stack & techniques](#tech-stack--techniques)
- [Testing](#testing)
- [Roadmap](#roadmap)
- [License](#license)
## Highlights
- 🇹🇭 **Real Thai compression** — PyThaiNLP `newmm` word segmentation, not whitespace.
- ♻️ **Lossless by guarantee** — every compress caches the original; `verified: true` proves a byte-for-byte round-trip.
- 🎚️ **Five modes**: from offline 1 ms TF-IDF to a 78%-savings cascade.
- 🧠 **Optional local LLM** — embeddings + rewrite via Ollama, with automatic offline fallback.
- 📏 **Honest metrics**: a real tokenizer (tiktoken) at runtime; Claude's own tokenizer and a
Thai QA eval for the published numbers ([Does Claude still get it right?](#does-claude-still-get-it-right)).
- 🕳️ **Visible gaps**: `[…]` marks every place sentences were dropped, so Claude retrieves
instead of mistaking a nearby fact for the answer.
- 🔌 **Content-aware** — JSON compaction, log dedup, and verbatim code-fence preservation built in.
- 🛟 **Can't break Claude** — it's an MCP tool, not an API proxy; if the server is down the tools just go away and Claude keeps working.
## Why it's safe — the two-tier guarantee
| Tier | What | Guarantee |
| ------------------------- | ------------------------------------ | ----------------------- |
| **Compressed view** | the shrunk text the model works on | lossy · small · cheap |
| **Retrieval store** | the original, keyed by a stable hash | lossless · recoverable |
Aggressive lossy compression is safe *because* the original is always one `sarup_retrieve(hash)`
away. This is how "maximum savings" and "100% accuracy" coexist — they live in different tiers.
## How it works
Two entry points feed one engine: a cheap **compressed view** the model reads, and a lossless
**retrieval store** that can restore the original byte-for-byte.
```mermaid
flowchart TD
M["🧑 Manual<br/>sarup_compress()"]:::entry --> R
A["⚙️ Automatic<br/>PostToolUse hook<br/>(Read · Bash · Grep)"]:::entry --> R
R{"Sarup compress<br/>extractive · semantic · abstractive · pipeline"}:::engine
R -- "compressed view<br/>50–78% fewer tokens" --> V["📄 Model context"]:::lossy
R -. "cache original" .-> S[("🗄️ Retrieval store<br/>hash → original")]:::lossless
V -. "need full detail?" .-> RET["🔑 sarup_retrieve(hash)"]:::lossless
RET --> S
S == "byte-for-byte ✓" ==> V
classDef entry fill:#e0e7ff,stroke:#6366f1,color:#111
classDef engine fill:#fde68a,stroke:#d97706,color:#111
classDef lossy fill:#fef3c7,stroke:#f59e0b,color:#111
classDef lossless fill:#bbf7d0,stroke:#16a34a,color:#111
```
- **Manual** — the model calls `sarup_compress` / `sarup_retrieve` itself.
- **Automatic** — the hook intercepts large tool outputs, caches the original to `SARUP_DB_PATH`,
and substitutes the compressed view + a retrieval hash. Source code is skipped; small outputs
pass through untouched.
## Tools
| Tool | Purpose |
| -------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| `sarup_compress(content, target_ratio?, lossless?, query?, mode?)` | Compress; returns compressed text, hash, token metrics,`verified`, `token_method`. |
| `sarup_retrieve(hash)` | Recover the original content byte-for-byte. |
| `sarup_stats()` | Cumulative session savings. |
**`sarup_compress` arguments**
| Arg | Type | Default | Meaning |
| ---------------- | ------- | -------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------- |
| `content` | string | — | Text to compress (required). |
| `target_ratio` | number | `0.5` | Fraction of prose to keep (0.1–0.9). |
| `lossless` | boolean | `false` | Only apply lossless transforms (whitespace / JSON compact). |
| `query` | string | `""` | What you need from the text; sentences matching it are kept. Pass it whenever you know: it took the QA eval from 69% to 100% at the same size. |
| `mode` | string | `extractive` | See modes below. |
## Compression modes
| Mode | How | Needs Ollama | Savings¹ | Speed¹ | Output |
| ---------------------------- | ----------------------------------------- | :----------: | :-------------: | :------: | --------------- |
| `extractive` *(default)* | TF-IDF scoring + fact boost + n-gram dedup | no | 52.7% | ~1 ms | verbatim subset |
| `semantic` | Embedding centrality + cosine dedup | yes | 63.8% | ~2 s | verbatim subset |
| `abstractive` | Local-LLM rewrite | yes | 44.4% | ~8 s | paraphrased |
| `pipeline` | Cascade: semantic → abstractive | yes | **78.2%** | ~6 s | paraphrased |
| `auto` | semantic if Ollama is up, else extractive | optional | 63.8% | ~2 s | subset |
¹ Measured on a 10-sentence Thai paragraph (522 tokens), rewrite model `gemma4:12b`. Every mode
stays 100% recoverable via the store; Ollama modes **degrade gracefully** to extractive when the
backend is down. (`gemma4:e4b`: pipeline 82.2%; June 2026, `gemma3:12b`: 88.1%.)
Extractive and semantic output is a verbatim subset of the input sentences, with `[…]` on its
own line wherever sentences were dropped. Sentences carrying specifics (numbers, Thai digits,
identifiers like `X-Api-Key`) score higher than general statements, since those are what
questions ask about.
## Measured results
```text
$ .\.venv\Scripts\python.exe bench\benchmark.py
sample before after savings verify
Thai prose 522 247 52.7% OK
Thai prose (aggressive) 522 189 63.8% OK
English prose 105 60 42.9% OK
JSON (lossless) 67 44 34.3% OK
Logs 563 300 46.7% OK
TOTAL 1779 840 52.8% ALL OK → 100% recoverable
Mode comparison (Thai prose, 522 tok):
extractive 52.7% (1ms) · semantic 63.8% (2.1s) · auto 63.8% (2.1s)
abstractive 44.4% (8.3s) · pipeline 78.2% (5.8s) ← gemma4:12b
```
Token counts via tiktoken `cl100k_base`. That is OpenAI's tokenizer and undercounts Claude,
most of all on Thai; `bench\benchmark.py --claude` adds a column from Claude's own tokenizer
(Anthropic `count_tokens`, needs an API key).
### Does Claude still get it right?
Fewer tokens only help if the facts survive. `bench\eval_qa.py` compresses 8 Thai documents
(incident report, meeting notes, API docs, HR policy, product spec, support chat, README, sales
report; half line-per-sentence, half dense paragraphs) and asks Claude Opus 5.5 32 questions
from the compressed view alone, graded deterministically:
```text
$ .\.venv\Scripts\python.exe bench\eval_qa.py # uses your local `claude` login
mode claude tok saved correct abstain wrong
──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
original 4601 0.0% 100% 0% 0
extractive:0.5 3204 30.4% 69% 31% 0
extractive:0.3 1969 57.2% 44% 56% 0
semantic:0.5 3214 30.1% 62% 38% 0
extractive:0.5+q 3207 30.3% 100% 0% 0
abstractive:0.5 2697 41.6% 91% 9% 0 ← gemma4:12b
pipeline:0.5 1854 59.8% 59% 41% 0 ← gemma4:12b
```
(`gemma4:e4b` scored the same: abstractive 91%, pipeline 59%, wrong 0.)
- **wrong = 0** is the safety property: when a fact was dropped, Claude said so (*abstain*) and
in real use would call `sarup_retrieve`. It did not guess from what was left.
- **abstain** is the real cost of blind compression: about a third of specific questions need a
retrieval round-trip at `0.5`. Know what you're looking for? Pass it as `query` (`+q` row).
- **abstractive** keeps the most facts per token (91% at 42% saved) because a rewrite can keep
every number while dropping words; extraction can only drop whole sentences. It costs seconds
per document, so use it through `sarup_compress`, not the hook.
- In both evals no paraphrase changed a fact into a wrong one, but 8 documents can't prove a
rewrite never will, which is why the original stays one `sarup_retrieve` away.
- Token counts here are Claude's own (from the answer calls' usage) and include the ~40-token
`[sarup: …]` footer, which weighs heavily on these short (~570-token) documents and fades on
the large outputs the hook actually compresses.
- 8 documents is a small sample; differences of a couple of questions between modes are noise.
Before the fixes this eval drove (Oct 2026): dense Thai paragraphs were not compressed at all
(the sentence splitter's model wasn't installed), `extractive:0.5` answered 59% with one
confident wrong answer, and `semantic:0.5` 47%.
## Example
A real `sarup_compress` call on a Thai paragraph (`mode="auto"`, Ollama up → semantic):
```jsonc
// → sarup_compress(content="…518-token Thai paragraph…", mode="auto")
{
"compressed": "จุดเด่นที่สำคัญที่สุดคือมันไม่มีทางทำให้ Claude พัง…",
"hash": "caa568140bec0ff734937cf5",
"original_tokens": 518,
"compressed_tokens": 154,
"tokens_saved": 364,
"savings_percent": 70.3,
"transforms": ["semantic_extractive", "embeddings", "thai"],
"lossy": true,
"verified": true, // round-trip proven byte-for-byte
"token_method": "tiktoken:cl100k_base"
}
```
The model keeps working on the 154-token view; the full 518-token original is one call away:
```jsonc
// → sarup_retrieve(hash="caa568140bec0ff734937cf5")
{ "content": "…the exact original text, restored byte-for-byte…" }
```
## Install
### As a Claude Code plugin (easiest)
Needs [uv](https://docs.astral.sh/uv/): the plugin runs Sarup through `uvx`, which fetches
Python and the dependencies on first use. Nothing to clone. In Claude Code:
```text
/plugin marketplace add PHUICMT/sarup
/plugin install sarup@sarup
```
That installs the MCP server, the auto-compression hook and the `/sarup:sarup-setup` skill.
The cache lives in the plugin's data directory, so it survives plugin updates. The first start
takes a few seconds while `uvx` builds the environment. From a shell instead:
`claude plugin marketplace add PHUICMT/sarup`, then `claude plugin install sarup@sarup`.
Ollama is optional. Without it everything works offline: the hook and the default
`extractive` mode never touch it, and asking for `semantic`, `abstractive` or `pipeline`
falls back to extractive with a `setup` field that names what to install. `sarup_stats`
shows what is available, and `/sarup:sarup-setup` walks through adding
[Ollama](https://ollama.com) and the models below.
### From PyPI (any MCP client)
The package is [`sarup` on PyPI](https://pypi.org/project/sarup/). With uv, nothing to install
by hand; point any MCP client at `uvx sarup`:
```json
{
"mcpServers": {
"sarup": {
"command": "uvx",
"args": ["sarup"],
"env": { "SARUP_DB_PATH": "/home/me/.sarup-cache.db" }
}
}
}
```
In Claude Code without the plugin: `claude mcp add sarup -s user -- uvx sarup`. The hook is
`uvx --from sarup sarup-hook --db <same file as SARUP_DB_PATH>`. `pip install sarup` works
too and puts `sarup` and `sarup-hook` on PATH.
### From a clone
**One command** (creates the venv, installs everything, registers the MCP server
for all projects, idempotent):
```powershell
.\scripts\setup.ps1 -All # Windows (-All also adds the hook, the /sarup-setup skill, pulls Ollama models)
./scripts/setup.sh --all # Linux / WSL / macOS
```
> Tip: `-All`/`--all` installs a global **`/sarup-setup`** skill, so on any other
> machine you can just type `/sarup-setup` in Claude Code and it walks through the
> install. (Or run `scripts/install-skill.ps1` / `install-skill.sh` on its own.)
Uninstall just as cleanly (only removes what Sarup added; `-Purge`/`--purge` also
deletes the venv + cache):
```powershell
.\scripts\uninstall.ps1 # Windows
./scripts/uninstall.sh # Linux / WSL / macOS
```
<details><summary>Manual install</summary>
```powershell
py -3.11 -m venv .venv
.\.venv\Scripts\python.exe -m pip install -e ".[dev]"
```
</details>
Optional local-LLM modes (`semantic` / `abstractive` / `pipeline`) need [Ollama](https://ollama.com):
```powershell
ollama pull nomic-embed-text # embeddings → semantic mode
ollama pull gemma4:12b # rewrite → abstractive / pipeline, 7.6 GB (or gemma4:e4b / gemma3:12b)
```
## Register with Claude Code
**One-command setup (recommended).** Detects this machine's paths, probes Ollama
(picks the best mode + models), and merges into `.mcp.json` / `.claude/settings.json`
**without clobbering** anything already there (a `.bak` is written first):
```powershell
.\.venv\Scripts\python.exe scripts\install.py --with-hook --pull
```
- No Ollama? It configures offline `extractive` mode — still fully works.
- Ollama up? It auto-selects `nomic-embed-text` (semantic) + the best installed rewrite model
(`gemma4:12b` → `gemma4:e4b` → `gemma3:12b` → `qwen3`) for `sarup_compress`.
The hook stays `extractive` either way (it runs on every tool call). `--pull` fetches
any missing models.
- Idempotent — safe to re-run; `--global` writes to `~/.claude` instead.
**Manual** — or add it yourself to your MCP config (e.g. `.mcp.json` or `~/.claude.json`).
Replace `<SARUP_DIR>` with the absolute path where you cloned this repo (the installer
above fills these in for you):
```json
{
"mcpServers": {
"sarup": {
"command": "<SARUP_DIR>/.venv/Scripts/python.exe",
"args": ["-m", "sarup.server"],
"env": { "SARUP_DB_PATH": "<SARUP_DIR>/.sarup-cache.db" }
}
}
}
```
> On Linux/macOS the interpreter is `<SARUP_DIR>/.venv/bin/python`.
Or run it directly over stdio:
```powershell
.\.venv\Scripts\python.exe -m sarup.server
```
## Auto-compression hook
Skip manual tool calls entirely: install the **PostToolUse hook** and large `Read`/`Bash`/`Grep`
outputs are compressed before they enter context, with the original cached for retrieval.
Source-code reads are skipped for safety. Full setup in **[hooks/README.md](hooks/README.md)**.
> **Fixed in October 2026.** Earlier versions returned the compressed text as a plain string.
> Claude Code only accepts `updatedToolOutput` in the tool's own shape (`{stdout, stderr, …}`
> for Bash, `{type, file: {content, …}}` for Read) and silently dropped the string, so the hook
> never applied on any surface. It now keeps each tool's shape; verified on the CLI (2.1.289):
> the model receives the compressed view and the retrieval hash. To see what the hook does on
> your build, set `SARUP_HOOK_LOG` to a file path (one JSON line per call).
The plugin wires this up for you. From a clone, replace `<SARUP_DIR>` with your clone path, or
run `install.py --with-hook`:
```json
{
"hooks": {
"PostToolUse": [
{ "matcher": "Read|Bash|Grep",
"hooks": [{ "type": "command",
"command": "<SARUP_DIR>/.venv/Scripts/sarup-hook --db <SARUP_DIR>/.sarup-cache.db" }] }
]
}
}
```
## Privacy & data
To guarantee recovery, Sarup caches the **original** content in the store. Two
things to know:
- With `SARUP_DB_PATH` set, originals are written to that **SQLite file in
plaintext** (no encryption). Treat it like a cache of whatever you compressed.
- If you compress tool outputs that contain secrets (e.g. a `.env` dump or
credentials in a log), those land in the cache too. The auto-hook skips
source-code/config file reads, but `Bash` output is fair game — review what
you point it at.
`*.db` is git-ignored, so the cache never gets committed. For zero on-disk
footprint, leave `SARUP_DB_PATH` unset (memory-only; the MCP server then loses
the cache on restart, and the hook will not substitute — see the hook docs).
## Configuration
| Var | Default | Meaning |
| --------------------------- | -------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| `SARUP_DB_PATH` | *(in-memory)* | SQLite path for a persistent, cross-process store.**Required** for hook retrieval. |
| `OLLAMA_HOST` | `http://localhost:11434` | Ollama endpoint. |
| `SARUP_ABSTRACTIVE_MODEL` | best installed | Model for abstractive / pipeline rewrite. Unset: first installed of `gemma4:12b`, `gemma4:e4b`, `gemma3:12b`, `qwen3`. |
| `SARUP_EMBED_MODEL` | `nomic-embed-text` | Model for semantic embeddings. |
| `SARUP_HOOK_MODE` | `extractive` | Hook compression mode. `auto`/`semantic` need Ollama and cost ~2 s per tool call. |
| `SARUP_HOOK_MIN_TOKENS` | `400` | Hook only compresses outputs with at least this many tokens (token-based, fair across languages). |
| `SARUP_HOOK_LOG` | *(off)* | File to append one JSON line per hook call (event, tool, size, substituted). |
## Project structure
```text
sarup/
├── src/sarup/
│ ├── server.py # MCP stdio server — 3 tools
│ ├── compressor.py # router + modes (extractive/semantic/abstractive/pipeline/auto)
│ ├── thai.py # PyThaiNLP tokenization, sentence split, TF-IDF
│ ├── semantic.py # embedding centrality + cosine dedup
│ ├── llm.py # optional Ollama backend (generate + embed)
│ ├── tokens.py # real token counting (tiktoken)
│ └── store.py # CCR store: hash → original (memory + SQLite)
├── hooks/
│ ├── sarup_hook.py # PostToolUse auto-compression hook
│ └── README.md # hook install guide
├── bench/benchmark.py # before/after measurement
├── tests/ # test_thai, test_mcp, test_hook, ...
├── README.md
└── STACK.md # full stack + techniques
```
## Tech stack & techniques
Python 3.11 · MCP · PyThaiNLP `newmm` · tiktoken · Ollama (optional) · SQLite · hatchling · pytest.
The technique behind each mode — TF-IDF scoring, embedding centrality, cascade pipeline, content
routing, and graceful degradation — is documented in **[STACK.md](STACK.md)**.
## Testing
```powershell
.\.venv\Scripts\python.exe -m pytest tests/ -q
```
The suite covers Thai NLP, the MCP tool contracts, every mode (including Ollama-fallback paths), the
roundtrip-verify guarantee, and the auto-compression hook (incl. cross-process retrieval).
Quality is measured separately, since it needs a model: `bench\eval_qa.py` (see
[Does Claude still get it right?](#does-claude-still-get-it-right)). It runs on the local
`claude` CLI by default, or `--backend api` with an Anthropic API key; `--dry-run` and
`--limit` keep a check cheap; a full run is ~170 Claude calls.
## Releasing
1. Bump `version` in `pyproject.toml` and `server.json` (both places in it).
2. Push a matching tag: `git tag v0.2.0 && git push origin v0.2.0`. The `publish` workflow
tests, builds and uploads to PyPI through trusted publishing (no token).
3. List the release in the MCP registry: `mcp-publisher login github`, then
`mcp-publisher publish` (reads `server.json`; the `mcp-name` comment at the top of
this README proves the PyPI package belongs to it).
The plugin needs none of this: it installs from the repo and updates with each commit.
## Roadmap
- [ ] Grow the QA eval past 8 documents (long tool outputs, logs, mixed code) before
changing defaults such as `auto` → semantic on the strength of it.
- [ ] Move to `mcp` 2.x (pinned `<2` for now: 2.x dropped `Server.list_tools`).
- [ ] Optional Typhoon 2.1 abstractive (blocked on an Ollama template fix).
- [ ] Per-content adaptive `target_ratio`.
- [x] Published PyPI package ([`sarup`](https://pypi.org/project/sarup/)) and MCP registry listing (`io.github.PHUICMT/sarup`).
- [x] Installable as a Claude Code plugin.
## License
MIT
TDQS
A4.2/5.0
Scored across 3 tools
Disambiguation5/5
Each tool has a distinct, well-defined purpose: compressing, retrieving via hash, and reporting statistics. There is no overlap or ambiguity.
Naming Consistency5/5
All tool names follow a consistent pattern with the 'sarup_' prefix followed by a verb (compress, retrieve, stats), making them predictable and easy to distinguish.
Tool Count5/5
Three tools is appropriate for the focused domain of context compression and retrieval. Each tool serves a clear, necessary function without bloat or shortage.
Completeness5/5
The tool set provides complete lifecycle coverage: compress, retrieve, and monitor statistics. No obvious gaps for its stated purpose.
Maintenance
ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessNo issues