Skip to main content
Glama
PB-Digital-LLC

everthread

Official

Related Servers

Alternatives to everthread

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server that exposes 31 OSINT checks from Lissy93/web-check as tools for website analysis, including SSL, DNS, headers, WHOIS, and security presets. Enables natural-language-driven web recon and health checks.
      8
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to perform authorized web security assessments through MCP tools and a guided review prompt, including passive and full scans, WAF detection, remediation fixes, report export, triage, scan comparison, and proof-of-control verification.
      12
      5
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Exposes website auditing, finding retrieval, and safe fix application as MCP tools so AI agents can diagnose and remediate SEO, accessibility, and technical web issues.
      6
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables users to add and verify ownership of targets, launch non-destructive security scans, and inspect or export run reports through MCP tools.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    check_site (run a scan), list_findings (enumerate all finding types), and explain_finding (deep-dive on one type) target distinct needs, and the description explicitly tells the agent to use list_findings for type names. The only mild overlap is between list_findings and explain_finding, both of which concern finding types, but their granularity (catalog vs. single explanation) keeps them separable.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All three names follow a clean verb_noun snake_case pattern: list_findings, check_site, explain_finding. No casing or verb-style mixing, and each name is self-descriptive.

    Tool Count4/5

    Three tools is lean but defensible for a focused security-check service: one action, one catalog, one explainer. It sits just under the comfortable range, as there is no room for managing or revisiting checks, but nothing is redundant.

    Completeness3/5

    The surface covers running a check and interpreting results, but has notable gaps: no tool to list previously checked sites or retrieve past/historical results, and despite the description touting a free daily watch, no tool exposes enabling or managing that monitoring. Agents can work around these for a one-off scan but hit a dead end for lifecycle/tracking workflows.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues