everthread
OfficialRelated Servers
Alternatives to everthread
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceMCP server that exposes 31 OSINT checks from Lissy93/web-check as tools for website analysis, including SSL, DNS, headers, WHOIS, and security presets. Enables natural-language-driven web recon and health checks.188MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables users to check HTTP status codes, find broken same-origin links, review SEO basics, and inspect common security headers with polite, permission-based crawling from any MCP client.4MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceEnables running comprehensive website audits from any MCP client, returning actionable plain-language reports covering SEO, accessibility, performance, security, and more.6250 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceExposes website auditing, finding retrieval, and safe fix application as MCP tools so AI agents can diagnose and remediate SEO, accessibility, and technical web issues.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables security analysis through MCP-compatible clients, including URL phishing checks, email header verification, JWT decoding, password strength analysis, and leaked secret scanning in code.51 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables querying MITRE's Common Weakness Enumeration database for vulnerability information, supporting CWE lookup, search, taxonomy navigation, and relationship mapping through MCP.97MIT
TDQS
Scored across 3 tools
check_site (run a scan), list_findings (enumerate all finding types), and explain_finding (deep-dive on one type) target distinct needs, and the description explicitly tells the agent to use list_findings for type names. The only mild overlap is between list_findings and explain_finding, both of which concern finding types, but their granularity (catalog vs. single explanation) keeps them separable.
All three names follow a clean verb_noun snake_case pattern: list_findings, check_site, explain_finding. No casing or verb-style mixing, and each name is self-descriptive.
Three tools is lean but defensible for a focused security-check service: one action, one catalog, one explainer. It sits just under the comfortable range, as there is no room for managing or revisiting checks, but nothing is redundant.
The surface covers running a check and interpreting results, but has notable gaps: no tool to list previously checked sites or retrieve past/historical results, and despite the description touting a free daily watch, no tool exposes enabling or managing that monitoring. Agents can work around these for a one-off scan but hit a dead end for lifecycle/tracking workflows.