Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to nano-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 7 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    The tools are mostly distinct: get_address, get_balance, get_history, verify_payment, and pay_and_call each have clear purposes. The main overlap is between quote and quote_usd, which both return pricing and addresses, but they are differentiated by currency (Nano vs USD). get_address also overlaps slightly with quote's returned address, but its standalone role is clear. Overall, an agent can reliably select the right tool.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Tool names follow a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern: get_address, get_balance, get_history, verify_payment, pay_and_call. The exceptions are 'quote' and 'quote_usd' which are nouns but function as verbs, and 'pay_and_call' is a compound but still reads naturally. The naming is predictable and consistent in style.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 7 tools, the server is well-scoped for a payment/verification system. Each tool covers a distinct step in the workflow (quoting, address retrieval, balance/history checks, payment verification, and combined pay+call), and no tool feels redundant or missing. The count is within the ideal 3-15 range.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set covers the core payment lifecycle: quoting (quote, quote_usd), address generation (get_address), payment verification (verify_payment), and a pay+call convenience (pay_and_call). Supplementary tools for balance and history are present. Minor gaps include lack of a cancel or quote status endpoint, but these are not critical for the primary flow and agents can work around with get_history or verify_payment status.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues