freeagent_create_task

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate a non-read-only, non-idempotent mutation. The description aligns with readOnlyHint=false and adds useful domain behavior (tasks set billing rates for logged time). It does not disclose idempotency implications, error behavior, or prerequisites, but annotations lower the burden.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences with no fluff. The first sentence is front-loaded and directly states the operation; the second provides essential context about billing rate. Every word earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The core function and domain relevance are covered. Given the 100% schema coverage and absence of an output schema, the description doesn't need to explain return values. It could mention that the project must exist or contrast with timeslip creation, but these are minor gaps.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with clear individual parameter descriptions. The description adds meaning by explaining that billingRate and billingPeriod define how logged time is charged, linking the billing parameters to the timeslip use case. This goes beyond the schema's isolated field descriptions.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action and resource: 'Create a task on a FreeAgent project.' It distinguishes from sibling create tools (e.g., create_contact, create_expense) by specifically naming 'task' and adds domain context about billing rates, which ties it to timeslips.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage by explaining that tasks carry the billing rate for logged time, suggesting a prerequisite before creating timeslips. However, it does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus alternatives like create_timeslip or list_tasks, nor does it mention exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.