multi_condition_payment

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description fully responsible for behavioral context. It states the conditional nature but does not disclose outcomes when conditions fail (e.g., no transaction sent, any fees incurred), permissions required, or side effects like state changes.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence that is direct and informative. No extraneous words. Front-loads the key action and condition constraint.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a tool with 6 parameters and no output schema, the description is minimal. It does not explain return values, error handling, or the fate of the payment if conditions fail. Adequate but could be more complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so parameters are well-documented. The tool description adds no new parameter-level meaning beyond restating the logic combination already in the schema. Baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states 'Send a payment only if multiple token price conditions pass, combined with AND or OR logic.' It specifies a concrete verb and resource, distinguishes from simpler conditional payment tools by emphasizing multiple conditions and logic combination.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Description implies usage for multi-condition payments but lacks explicit guidance on when to choose this over alternatives like 'conditional_payment' or 'send_token'. No 'when not to use' or prerequisite conditions provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.