Skip to main content
Glama
Discord MCP - Discord server management MCP for AI agents

Discord MCP - Discord server management MCP for AI agents

List voice members

list_voice_members
Read-only

Lists who is currently in a voice or stage channel, including their mute and deafen state, so agents can check live voice presence on the server.

Instructions

Who is currently in a voice or stage channel, with their mute and deafen state. This reads the live voice presence the gateway tracks, so it reflects the time since this server connected.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "channel": "<channel>"
    },
    "name": "list_voice_members"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
guildNoGuild (server) name or ID. Omit to use the default guild.
channelYesVoice or stage channel name or ID.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changedv1.4.2
    • changedInput schema / $schema
      Previous value: -"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"New value: +"https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema"
  2. Changed1 schema field changedv1.3.0
    • removedInput schema / additionalProperties
      Removed value: -false
  3. First observedv1.0.2

TDQS

A3.8/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, so the safety profile is covered. The description goes beyond that by disclosing a real behavioral caveat: the data comes from gateway-tracked live presence and is only as fresh as the connection uptime, which an agent would otherwise misread as authoritative.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two short sentences: the capability first, then the freshness caveat. No filler, no repetition of the title, and the most decision-relevant information is front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a two-parameter read tool with full schema coverage and no output schema, the definition supplies what is needed: what is returned (members with mute/deafen state) and how current the data is. Only the response shape (e.g. whether member IDs and counts are included) is left unstated.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, covering both guild (optional, defaults to the default guild) and channel. The description adds no syntax, ID-format, or channel-type detail beyond the schema, so the baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb-like scope (who is currently in a voice or stage channel) plus two returned attributes, mute and deafen state. That distinguishes it from the broader list_members/list_thread_members siblings in substance, though no sibling is named explicitly.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Usage is implied: read this when you need live voice presence rather than general membership. There is no explicit when-to-use versus list_members or list_stages, and no stated prerequisite such as needing to know the channel first, so guidance stays inferred.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools