mx-fiscal-mcp-server
mx-fiscal-mcp-server
An MCP server that gives an AI agent Mexican tax and banking capabilities — validate RFC, CURP, CLABE and NSS with real check digits, read a CFDI 4.0 invoice, ask the SAT whether it is still live, and look up the SAT's code tables. No API keys, no CSD certificate, no PAC contract.
Ask Claude "read this invoice and tell me whether it's still valid" and it parses the XML, labels every SAT code, checks both RFCs and the arithmetic, and queries the SAT's public status service — instead of you opening three web tools.
> Read this CFDI and check it at the SAT
parse_cfdi(xml="<cfdi:Comprobante …>")
CFDI A-1042 — 1160.00 MXN
✅ Stamped · version 4.0 · Ingreso
Emisor: TES150312DX2 ✅ 601 — General de Ley Personas Morales
Receptor: PELJ900521DK2 ✅ G03 — Gastos en general
✅ Totals add up: subtotal − discount + transferred − withheld = total
cfdi_status(xml="<cfdi:Comprobante …>")
CFDI status — Vigente
✅ The invoice exists in the SAT's records and has not been cancelled.
Es cancelable: Cancelable con aceptación
EFOS: returned 200 — the issuer is NOT on the SAT's definitive 69-B list.Why this exists
Mexican electronic invoicing has two halves, and only one of them was served.
Building and stamping a CFDI needs a CSD certificate and a contract with a PAC.
That half already has tooling — mcp-cfdi-mx
(Python) does it, and this server deliberately does not compete with it.
Reading is the other half, and it needs nothing: the check-digit algorithms are
public, the SAT's catalogues are public, and the invoice status service behind the QR
code on every printed invoice is public and unauthenticated. Yet an agent asked to
validate an RFC will happily invent a regex that rejects XAXX010101000 — the RFC of
every invoice issued to the general public — because that one does not satisfy its own
check digit. This server is the read half, done carefully.
The arithmetic comes from mx-identifiers
(MIT, zero dependencies, 101 tests against public vectors); the CFDI reader is ported
from the tool running at ortamarco.me;
the SOAP envelope was read out of nodecfdi/sat-estado-cfdi
rather than guessed. It is the third of three read-only, key-free MCP servers alongside
domain-security-mcp-server
and seo-geo-mcp-server.
Tools
Identifiers
Tool | What it does |
| RFC for individuals (13 chars) and companies (12), full modulus-11 check digit, parsed fields, birth/incorporation date. Flags the SAT generics and says which of them satisfies the arithmetic |
| 18-character CURP with the base-37 check digit; decodes birth date, sex, state (RENAPO keys, not INEGI/ISO) and the century marker |
| 18-digit CLABE with the correct 3-7-1 control digit — each product reduced modulo 10 before summing, which is the step most implementations skip — plus the Banxico bank and the plaza code |
| 11-digit IMSS number with its Luhn digit, split into subdelegación / registration year / birth year / serial |
| 1-100 coherent fake people or companies: the RFC and CURP derive from the same name and birth date, the CLABE's bank is a real participant, every check digit holds |
CFDI
Tool | What it does |
| CFDI 4.0 XML → JSON: header, issuer, receiver, every line item with transferred and withheld taxes, tax totals, and the Timbre Fiscal Digital (or |
| Queries the SAT's public |
Catalogues
Tool | What it does |
| Nine bundled code tables — |
Every tool is read-only, declares an outputSchema and returns structuredContent
(validated by the SDK) alongside human-readable Markdown (default) or JSON
(response_format="json").
Honesty notes
These are surfaced in the tool output, not buried here:
Structurally valid is not registered. A check digit that adds up says the string is well-formed and nothing more. Only the SAT can say an RFC is registered; only RENAPO that a CURP belongs to a person. This server never asks either, and its wording never implies it did.
XAXX010101000does not satisfy its own check digit. The SAT assigned the general-public RFC by decree and the modulus-11 algorithm asks for a4where the SAT wrote a0.XEXX010101000(foreign residents) does satisfy it. The tools reportis_genericandcheck_digit_satisfiedas separate fields rather than collapsing both into "valid".Reading a CFDI is not verifying it.
parse_cfdidoes not check the digital signature. A perfectly parseable invoice can be cancelled, or fabricated wholesale.An unreachable SAT is not an invalid invoice. The status endpoint publishes no rate limit, no SLA and no status page, and it goes down.
cfdi_statusdegrades toavailable: falsewith the reason — a statement about the SAT, never about the document.The bank list is a subset.
bancos_clabecarries the main Banxico participants, not the full catalogue; an unknown code is reported as unknown rather than given an invented name. The plaza catalogue is not bundled at all, so the plaza code is returned verbatim.The EFOS mapping is an interpretation. The SAT documents neither the
ValidacionEFOScode table nor the field itself.200/201meaning "not on the 69-B list" is the mappingphpcfdiandnodecfdiboth use, and it is labelled as such. An empty field is reported asunknown, never as "listed".
Protocol
Built on the v2 MCP SDK, so it speaks the 2026-07-28 revision (server/discover,
no initialize, per-request _meta envelope) and still serves 2025-era clients —
Claude Desktop, Claude Code and Cursor — from the same server factory. The entry points
own the era decision: serveStdio(factory) on stdio, createMcpHandler(factory) over
HTTP with the default legacy: 'stateless'. There is no session state and no
Mcp-Session-Id in either direction. npm run smoke exercises every tool on both
eras and asserts the negotiated era of each connection.
Because the tool list is a compile-time constant, tools/list and server/discover
advertise a real one-hour ttlMs with cacheScope: 'public' on 2026-era connections
instead of the SDK's conservative ttlMs: 0.
Install
Requires Node.js 20+. Nothing to clone — every MCP client can run it with npx.
Use it with Claude Code
claude mcp add mx-fiscal -- npx -y mx-fiscal-mcp-serverUse it with Claude Desktop or Cursor
Add to claude_desktop_config.json (or ~/.cursor/mcp.json) — see examples/:
{
"mcpServers": {
"mx-fiscal": {
"command": "npx",
"args": ["-y", "mx-fiscal-mcp-server"]
}
}
}On Windows use "command": "cmd" with "args": ["/c", "npx", "-y", "mx-fiscal-mcp-server"].
Restart the client, then ask: "Generate 10 Mexican customers with valid RFC and CURP for my seed file."
Self-host (HTTP transport)
The same server speaks stateless Streamable HTTP for remote or multi-client use.
TRANSPORT=http npx -y mx-fiscal-mcp-server
# POST JSON-RPC to http://127.0.0.1:3000/mcp · health at /healthzIt is safe by default: it binds to 127.0.0.1 and only accepts localhost
Host and Origin headers, which blocks DNS-rebinding attacks from a web page.
To expose it — for example behind Coolify or Traefik — opt in explicitly:
Variable | Default | Purpose |
|
|
|
|
| Listening port |
|
| Bind address; |
| — | Comma-separated hostnames the |
| — | Comma-separated origins allowed to call from a browser |
| — | If set, every request needs |
|
| Largest CFDI accepted, in characters |
|
|
|
A self-hosted instance makes requests to the SAT on its callers' behalf, so do
not expose it without MCP_AUTH_TOKEN: an open one is a free relay that can get
your IP rate-limited. With Docker (the image sets HOST=0.0.0.0):
docker build -t mx-fiscal-mcp .
docker run -p 3000:3000 -e ALLOWED_HOSTS=mcp.example.com -e MCP_AUTH_TOKEN=change-me mx-fiscal-mcpDevelop
npm run dev # tsx watch (stdio)
npm run typecheck # tsc --noEmit
npm test # deterministic offline unit tests, HTTP transport defaults included
npm run smoke # every tool over the real protocol, on BOTH eras
npm run inspect # MCP Inspector against the built server
npm run build # type-check + emit dist/How it works
src/
├── index.ts # transport selection: serveStdio | createMcpHandler + Express
├── server.ts # the server FACTORY — registers every tool, holds the instructions
├── schemas.ts # Zod 4 outputSchema for each tool
├── constants.ts # the single external host, timeouts, limits
├── format.ts # markdown/JSON response shaping, findings
├── core/ # pure logic, no MCP coupling — reusable & testable
│ ├── identifiers.ts # reporting layer over mx-identifiers (errors, labels, findings)
│ ├── cfdi.ts # the CFDI 4.0 reader, ported 1:1 from the web tool
│ ├── sat.ts # SOAP envelope, expression builder, response interpretation
│ ├── catalogs.ts # the nine code tables + lookup
│ └── testdata.ts # fixture generation
└── tools/ # thin MCP wrappers (Zod schemas, descriptions, formatting)The core/ layer carries no MCP types, so the same logic backs both this server and a
web UI. All the check-digit arithmetic lives in mx-identifiers and is not
reimplemented here.
Network surface: exactly one host, consultaqr.facturaelectronica.sat.gob.mx,
hardcoded in constants.ts. No tool accepts a URL from the caller, so there is no
SSRF surface to guard. The other seven tools make no network calls at all.
Untrusted XML: a document that declares a DOCTYPE is refused before parsing (a
CFDI never has one), and size and element-count caps bound the memory one parse can
take. cfdi_status screens the RFCs, total and UUID before spending a request on
them. Found a problem? Please open a private security advisory.
En español
Un servidor MCP que le da a un agente de IA las capacidades fiscales mexicanas que todo el mundo acaba reimplementando mal: validar RFC, CURP, CLABE y NSS con sus dígitos verificadores de verdad, leer un CFDI 4.0 en XML, consultar su estado en el SAT y buscar en los catálogos del SAT. Sin API keys, sin CSD y sin PAC.
Esto es la mitad de LECTURA. Para construir y sellar un CFDI hace falta un
certificado de sello digital y un PAC, y eso ya lo cubre
mcp-cfdi-mx (Python). Este servidor no
compite con él: lo complementa.
Lo que sí hace bien y casi nadie:
XAXX010101000no satisface su propio dígito verificador. El SAT lo asignó por decreto y el módulo 11 pide un4donde el SAT puso un0.XEXX010101000(residentes en el extranjero) sí lo satisface. Por eso tantos formularios rechazan las facturas al público en general. Las tools devuelvenis_genericycheck_digit_satisfiedpor separado.El dígito de control de la CLABE reduce cada producto módulo 10 antes de sumar. Las implementaciones que suman primero, al estilo Luhn, aceptan y rechazan cuentas equivocadas.
Las claves de entidad de la CURP son de RENAPO, no de INEGI ni ISO 3166-2:MX.
DFes Ciudad de México,MCes Estado de México,NEes nacido en el extranjero.El servicio del SAT se cae y no publica límite de tasa.
cfdi_statusdegrada aavailable: falsecon el motivo; nunca lanza una excepción, y nunca hay que leer un fallo del SAT como "la factura es inválida".Estructuralmente válido no es dado de alta. Que el dígito cuadre dice que la cadena está bien formada, nada más.
Se instala sin clonar nada: claude mcp add mx-fiscal -- npx -y mx-fiscal-mcp-server.
El motor aritmético es mx-identifiers
(MIT, cero dependencias); el lector de CFDI viene de la herramienta que corre en
ortamarco.me; el sobre SOAP se leyó
del código de nodecfdi/sat-estado-cfdi,
no se inventó.
Habla la revisión 2026-07-28 del protocolo y sigue atendiendo a los clientes de 2025 (Claude Desktop, Claude Code, Cursor) desde la misma factoría de servidor.
License
MIT © Marco Orta