Orisha Signing Keys
orisha_signing_keysFetch the public set of keys used to sign and verify responses.
Instructions
Fetch the public response-signing key set.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
orisha_signing_keysFetch the public set of keys used to sign and verify responses.
Fetch the public response-signing key set.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided; description only says 'Fetch', implying read-only but fails to disclose any behavioral traits like authentication needs or rate limits.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, no wasted words, front-loaded with the action and resource.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
No output schema; description does not explain what the response contains (e.g., format of key set), leaving the agent uninformed about the tool's output.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
No parameters; schema coverage is 100% trivially. Baseline of 4 applies, but description adds no extra context about the returned key set.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states verb 'Fetch' and specific resource 'public response-signing key set', distinguishing it from sibling tools like orisha_c1_preview.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives; missing context such as prerequisites or typical use cases.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/OrishaAI/orisha-data-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server