list_app_store_versions

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It explains the tool lists versions and supports filters, but does not disclose pagination behavior (though the limit parameter is in the schema), read-only nature, or potential limitations (e.g., data freshness, ordering). The description is adequate but not thorough.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence that front-loads the purpose and then lists filters. It is concise, with no superfluous words, and every phrase adds value.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the moderate complexity (5 parameters, no output schema), the description covers the core functionality and filters. It names the key fields returned, but an explicit listing of return fields or guidance on the 'release type' field would improve completeness. Overall, it is mostly sufficient.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the parameter descriptions already define each parameter. The tool description merely restates the filtering capability without adding semantic nuances (e.g., format for version string, case sensitivity for state). No additional value beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool lists App Store versions for an app and enumerates the fields returned (version string, platform, App Store state, release type). It mentions filtering capabilities but does not explicitly differentiate from sibling list tools, though the context of app-specific versions is distinct.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description indicates filtering by platform, version string, or App Store state, but provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus other list tools (e.g., list_apps, list_builds). There is no mention of prerequisites, context, or alternatives.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.