Skip to main content
Glama
OrellBuehler

sonarr-mcp

by OrellBuehler

delete_release_profile

Remove a release profile by its ID to stop Sonarr from applying unwanted quality restrictions and keep your downloads aligned with current preferences.

Instructions

Delete a release profile.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
idYesRelease profile id

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.

  1. First observedv0.1.0

TDQS

B3.3/5.0
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden of disclosing behavior. 'Delete' implies destructiveness, but the description does not mention whether deletion is permanent, whether it can fail (e.g., if the profile is referenced), or what response to expect. This is a minimal behavioral disclosure.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

One clean, grammatically complete sentence with zero filler. It front-loads the action and resource immediately, and is as concise as a simple deletion tool description can reasonably be.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a very simple 1-parameter tool, the description is nearly sufficient to invoke it, but it lacks any behavioral context such as irreversibility or error conditions. The absence of an output schema and annotations raises the burden on the description, leaving this minimally viable but not complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema already provides 100% coverage for the single parameter, describing 'id' as 'Release profile id'. The description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema, so the baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific action ('Delete') on a specific resource ('release profile'), which unambiguously distinguishes it from sibling tools like create_release_profile, update_release_profile, and list_release_profiles. No ambiguity about what the tool does.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is given on when to use this tool versus alternatives, such as noting that the id should come from list_release_profiles or that there may be restrictions on deleting profiles in use. The description simply states the action without any context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/OrellBuehler/sonarr-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server