Skip to main content
Glama
OpenTorah-ai

Sefaria Jewish Library MCP Server

by OpenTorah-ai
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to Sefaria Jewish Library MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • mcp-sefaria

      pipeworx-io
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to access and query the Sefaria digital library of Jewish texts through natural language or direct tool calls.
      3 npm
      MIT

    • Sefaria Jewish Library MCP

      Sivan22
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides access to Jewish texts from the Sefaria library. This server enables Large Language Models to retrieve and reference Jewish texts through a standardized interface.
      4
      34
      MIT
    • Sefaria MCP Server by Sefaria

      Sefaria MCP Serverofficial

      Sefaria
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables LLMs to access and search Jewish texts from the Sefaria library through 15 MCP tools, including text retrieval, search, and manuscript access.
      24
      MIT

    • torah-mcp

      JonathanB555
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server that provides access to the Sefaria library (Tanakh, Talmud, Mishneh Torah, etc.) with tools for text, links, search, and calendars. It enables grounded, source-cited answers to religious questions and daily study resources.
      1
      MIT

    • mcp-otzaria-server

      Sivan22
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that provides powerful search capabilities for Jewish texts and literature. This server enables Large Language Models to search and reference Jewish texts through a standardized interface.
      23
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.1/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: get_commentaries retrieves commentary references for a text, while get_text retrieves the text itself. There is no overlap or ambiguity between these operations, making it easy for an agent to select the correct tool based on the need.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both tools follow a consistent verb_noun naming pattern (get_commentaries and get_text), using the same verb 'get' and descriptive nouns. This uniformity makes the tool set predictable and easy to understand at a glance.

    Tool Count2/5

    With only 2 tools, the server feels under-scoped for a library domain that typically involves more operations like search, update, or categorization. While the tools cover basic retrieval, the count is too low to support comprehensive interactions with a Jewish library, limiting agent capabilities.

    Completeness2/5

    The tool set is severely incomplete for a library server, lacking essential operations such as search, filtering, creation, or management of texts and commentaries. Agents will face dead ends when trying to perform common library tasks beyond simple retrieval, leading to potential failures.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources