Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to jev-browser-use-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables coding agents to inspect and operate web pages in the user's Chrome browser through a single browser tool, carrying out clicks, typing, navigation, and page reads while pausing for approval on risky or sensitive actions.
      1 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables agents to perform typed, site-specific actions across a signed-in Chrome browser, interacting with services like Gmail, Reddit, Drive, and Amazon through natural language requests.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Gives coding agents full control over a real Chrome browser, enabling navigation, clicking, typing, screenshotting, and more via an MCP server and Chrome extension.
      27 npm
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables agents to control a real Chromium browser with semantic tools, providing compact observations and outcome-verified actions for web interaction tasks.
      18 PyPI
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables any coding agent to use the user's existing Chrome profiles and logins to open tabs, read pages, fill forms, click through flows, and take screenshots.
      239 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.8/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools have clearly distinct responsibilities: one drives and continues browser sessions, the other closes them. There is no overlap or ambiguity between starting/continuing work and cleaning up a session.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both names follow a consistent verb_noun snake_case pattern with the browser prefix: run_browser_task and close_browser_session. The naming is predictable and easy to reason about.

    Tool Count3/5

    Two tools is on the thin end, but run_browser_task intentionally subsumes a broad range of browser actions through a goal-based interface. It is reasonable for a minimal server, though the surface feels slightly limited.

    Completeness4/5

    The core browser-use lifecycle is covered: start a task, continue/redirect it, and close the session. Minor gaps exist, such as no explicit session listing or status tool, but the natural-language task abstraction covers most practical workflows.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive