Opedd
OfficialRelated Servers
Alternatives to Opedd
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceAI asset compliance and licensing. Search pre-cleared assets matched to your brief. Usage agreement auto-generated at checkout. Works with Claude and any MCP-compatible agent.320 npmMIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceProvides AI agents and RAG pipelines with production-grade web search, deep research, news, academic, extraction, crawling, and source verification tools. Enables citation-anchored, deduplicated, fresh, and security-hardened evidence gathering from across the web.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceGives AI agents 21 tools to verify artists, identify tracks by perceptual audio fingerprint, read and register rights manifests, and audit a music-rights registry, with royalties cascading down derivation chains. It also covers royalty balances, checkout, epoch snapshots, audience insights, and workflow triggers.17 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents to search a proprietary knowledge base for free and buy access to documents or passages on demand, with automatic payment, licensing, and citation.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceProvides AI agents with 12 real-time tools for search synthesis, grounded research dossiers, claim verification, citation generation, sentiment analysis, expert ranking, timeline creation, and competitive landscape mapping over Streamable HTTP or stdio.112MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceProvenance-first web access for AI agents, delivering clean content with verifiable source metadata and SEC EDGAR financial data.8114 npmMIT
TDQS
Scored across 20 tools
Most tools target distinct resources, but several pairs blur together: purchase_license vs place_licence_order (both buy licences), list_feed vs stream_feed_ndjson (same catalog, different transport), and get_audit_events vs get_compliance_dossier vs list_licence_orders (overlapping audit surfaces). The verbose descriptions do most of the disambiguation work, which suggests the tool boundaries are not self-evident from names alone.
The overall pattern is verb_noun snake_case, which is good, but the set mixes US 'license' (purchase_license, verify_license) with UK 'licence' (place_licence_order, list_licence_orders) for the same core concept, and it intermixes noun-only tools like publisher_directory and rsl_get. The inconsistent spelling of the central domain object is a real readability hazard.
20 tools is on the heavy side of the 3-15 ideal, but this is a two-sided licensing marketplace spanning buyer search/purchase, licence orders, feeds, audit/compliance, and publisher supply-side operations, so each tool maps to a defensible capability. Slightly over-scoped rather than bloated.
Coverage is broad: discovery (search_content, lookup_content, publisher_directory, rsl_get), purchase and ordering, delivery (get_content, list_feed, stream_feed_ndjson, search_passages), audit/compliance, and publisher supply (push_content, list_publisher_content). Minor gaps exist around updating or deleting pushed content and buyer account mutation, but core workflows are covered end to end.