Skip to main content
Glama
Opedd

Opedd

Official

Related Servers

Alternatives to Opedd

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides AI agents and RAG pipelines with production-grade web search, deep research, news, academic, extraction, crawling, and source verification tools. Enables citation-anchored, deduplicated, fresh, and security-hardened evidence gathering from across the web.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Gives AI agents 21 tools to verify artists, identify tracks by perceptual audio fingerprint, read and register rights manifests, and audit a music-rights registry, with royalties cascading down derivation chains. It also covers royalty balances, checkout, epoch snapshots, audience insights, and workflow triggers.
      17 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to search a proprietary knowledge base for free and buy access to documents or passages on demand, with automatic payment, licensing, and citation.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides AI agents with 12 real-time tools for search synthesis, grounded research dossiers, claim verification, citation generation, sentiment analysis, expert ranking, timeline creation, and competitive landscape mapping over Streamable HTTP or stdio.
      1
      12
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provenance-first web access for AI agents, delivering clean content with verifiable source metadata and SEC EDGAR financial data.
      8
      114 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 20 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    Most tools target distinct resources, but several pairs blur together: purchase_license vs place_licence_order (both buy licences), list_feed vs stream_feed_ndjson (same catalog, different transport), and get_audit_events vs get_compliance_dossier vs list_licence_orders (overlapping audit surfaces). The verbose descriptions do most of the disambiguation work, which suggests the tool boundaries are not self-evident from names alone.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    The overall pattern is verb_noun snake_case, which is good, but the set mixes US 'license' (purchase_license, verify_license) with UK 'licence' (place_licence_order, list_licence_orders) for the same core concept, and it intermixes noun-only tools like publisher_directory and rsl_get. The inconsistent spelling of the central domain object is a real readability hazard.

    Tool Count4/5

    20 tools is on the heavy side of the 3-15 ideal, but this is a two-sided licensing marketplace spanning buyer search/purchase, licence orders, feeds, audit/compliance, and publisher supply-side operations, so each tool maps to a defensible capability. Slightly over-scoped rather than bloated.

    Completeness4/5

    Coverage is broad: discovery (search_content, lookup_content, publisher_directory, rsl_get), purchase and ordering, delivery (get_content, list_feed, stream_feed_ndjson, search_passages), audit/compliance, and publisher supply (push_content, list_publisher_content). Minor gaps exist around updating or deleting pushed content and buyer account mutation, but core workflows are covered end to end.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive