getCurrentSelection
Retrieves the currently highlighted text selection from the editor.
Instructions
Get the current text selection in the editor
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Retrieves the currently highlighted text selection from the editor.
Get the current text selection in the editor
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already indicate readOnlyHint=true, so the description adds minimal behavioral context beyond implying a read operation. It does not mention what happens when no selection exists (e.g., returns null) or any other side effects.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single sentence of 8 words, front-loading the purpose with no extraneous information. Every word earns its place.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given no output schema, the description could hint at the return format (string? object?). It says 'text selection' but is vague. For a simple tool, it is adequate but could be more precise.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The tool has no parameters, and schema coverage is 100%. With zero parameters, the baseline is 4, and the description does not need to add parameter information.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states 'Get the current text selection in the editor', specifying the verb (get) and resource (current text selection). It distinguishes from siblings like getLatestSelection and selectionRanges by focusing on 'current' selection.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as getLatestSelection or selectionRanges. The description lacks any context on appropriate usage or when to avoid it.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Oolab-labs/patchwork-os'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server