Skip to main content
Glama
3dpacking-mcp

3dpacking-mcp

by OnurGumus

Related Servers

Alternatives to 3dpacking-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to pack trucks and shipping containers by generating validated 3D load plans with metrics like LDM, linear feet, and pallet positions through the Hansatic packing API.
      3
      7 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Plan optimal container & truck loads: 3D layouts, right-size the container mix, and check utilization, centre of gravity, crush protection and securing across 200+ equipment types.
      8 npm
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Connects AI assistants to CargoEffe for automated cargo loading plan design, offering tools to manage containers, cargo items, and load plans.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables optimal freight-mode selection (air, sea-LCL, full container) by solving 3D bin-packing, cost optimization, and delivery-risk analysis behind two tools: solve for deterministic planning and explain for hallucination-proof natural-language narration of results.
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to read and manage ocean container shipments across major carriers, answering questions about a container's location, arrivals this week, delays, and full carrier event history. It also lets clients start tracking new containers and generate share links through a hosted, OAuth-authenticated endpoint.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to track air waybills and ocean containers and compare freight quotes across carriers through typed, validated tools, with normalized milestone timelines, ETAs and check-digit validation.
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.6/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    With only one tool, there is no possibility of confusion or overlap. The single tool's purpose is clearly defined in its description.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The tool name 'pack_shipment' follows a clear verb_noun pattern, which is a good convention. However, with only one tool, there is no broader pattern to assess for consistency.

    Tool Count3/5

    A single tool for a domain like 3D packing feels thin, as users might expect additional capabilities such as container management or multi-shipment optimization. The count is at the low end of the borderline range.

    Completeness3/5

    The tool covers the core packing operation comprehensively, but the server lacks auxiliary tools for activities like validating container specifications or comparing alternative packing strategies. This leaves some gaps in the overall workflow.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo recent community issues