Skip to main content
Glama
OnStartups

Agent.ai MCP Server

by OnStartups
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to Agent.ai MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • mult-fetch-mcp-server

      lmcc-dev
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables AI assistants to fetch web content in multiple formats (HTML, JSON, text, Markdown) with intelligent content extraction, chunk management, and browser automation support.
      5
      27 npm
      15
      MIT

    • hidrix-tools

      sonpiaz
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP tool server that gives any AI agent the ability to search, scrape, and analyze content across the internet.
      42
      MIT

    • mcp-toolkit

      YoshiLoL0526
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A general-purpose MCP server providing web search, persistent memory storage, and secure code execution capabilities. It enables AI agents to search the web, store and retrieve data, and run Python/JavaScript code in sandboxed environments.
      8
      MIT

    • mcp-web-tools-server

      ZephyraRR
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A custom MCP server that provides AI agents with tools to fetch web pages, extract readable article text, extract structured data by CSS selector, and check robots.txt permissions.
      MIT

    • Oktyv

      duke-of-beans
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables AI agents to execute real-world actions through 10 specialized engines covering authenticated API calls, browser automation, visual QA, shell commands, file operations, job scraping, and parallel task execution.
      -
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    C2.7/5.0

    Scored across 177 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    Many tools are well-differentiated within their domains, but the presence of parallel v2 and v3 versions (e.g., meeting_prep vs. meeting_prep_v3) and overlapping contact/outreach research tools create ambiguity. Agents may struggle to choose between similar tools.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tools follow a consistent domain_subdomain_action pattern with underscores. However, a few tools lack domain prefixes (e.g., `process_video`, `search`) and hubspot tools use dots, causing minor inconsistency.

    Tool Count2/5

    177 tools is excessive for any server, even one covering multiple domains. The count is inflated by parallel v2/v3 variants and many render functions that could be consolidated. It would be overwhelming for an agent to navigate.

    Completeness4/5

    Within each subdomain (file conversion, social media, meeting prep, outreach, etc.), the tool surface is thorough, covering creation, analysis, rendering, and pipeline steps. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no YouTube upload), but overall coverage is strong.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources