Skip to main content
Glama
OnChainAIIntel

PQS - Prompt Quality Score

Official

Related Servers

Alternatives to PQS - Prompt Quality Score

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server providing 22 pay-per-call utility tools for AI agents (scrape, validate, embed, store, moderate, notify, convert, prevent loops) without accounts or API keys, using USDC payments via the x402 protocol.
      17
      55 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server exposing 58 online tools (crypto, data, image, text, etc.) and workflow execution, enabling MCP clients like Claude Desktop to invoke them via natural language.
      58
      4 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server for deterministic prompt optimization in Claude Code. Score prompts across 7 quality dimensions, auto-select from 11 Anthropic techniques, and return a structural scaffold.
      1
      7 npm
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Remote MCP server for prediction markets — search and compare live odds across Polymarket, Kalshi, and Limitless from Claude, ChatGPT, or Gemini. Six read-only tools, free tier available.
      6
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Dynamic MCP server — 30+ tools across fact verification, agent memory, Indian NLP, contract risk, security threat modelling, sales call intelligence and more. x402/USDC micropayments on Base.
      33
      6 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.8/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: one scores a prompt, the other optimizes it. Their use cases and prerequisites are well-defined, so an agent cannot confuse them.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern: 'score_prompt' and 'optimize_prompt'. The naming is uniform and predictable.

    Tool Count4/5

    With only two tools, the set is narrowly scoped to prompt scoring and optimization. While this is appropriate for the domain, slightly more tools (e.g., subscription management or rubric access) could enhance completeness without bloat.

    Completeness4/5

    The server covers the core workflow of scoring and optimizing prompts. However, it lacks tools for subscription management, retrieving the rubric, or performing batch operations, which are minor gaps given the stated dependencies and cost structure.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues