Прямой GET-запрос к Fintablo

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description discloses read-only nature and that it accesses permitted paths under /v1, but lacks details on authentication requirements, error behavior, or response format. With no annotations, more transparency would be beneficial.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very concise with two efficient sentences. The first sentence conveys the purpose, and the second provides a critical usage warning. No superfluous text.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

While the description covers the tool's purpose and usage boundaries, it does not explain the return format or pagination. Given no output schema, additional details would improve completeness, but the tool is simple and context is adequate for exploration.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema provides an example for the path parameter ('/deal или /transaction'), adding meaning beyond type. The query parameter lacks description, and the tool description does not elaborate further. 50% schema coverage is partially compensated by the example.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly specifies it is a read-only GET request to allowed Fintablo /v1 paths for data exploration. It distinguishes from sibling get_nzp by warning not to use results for final figures.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explicitly states when not to use the tool ('НЕ используйте результаты как основу для итоговой цифры') and points to the alternative get_nzp, providing clear usage guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.