template_update

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It only notes that the tool 'update's' attributes, implying mutation, but lacks details on side effects, authorization needs, error handling, or idempotency. The existence of an output schema partially mitigates return value description, but behavioral context is minimal.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise at one sentence, with no wasted words. It is front-loaded with the essential action. However, it could include more useful information without becoming overly long, so it is efficient but not perfect.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool is a mutation operation with two required parameters (one being a free-form object), the description is too minimal. It does not explain the structure of the updates object, any restrictions, or the expected behavior when the template does not exist. The output schema provides return structure, but the description is incomplete for effective use.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 0% description coverage for parameters, and the description does not mention any parameter details. The 'updates' object with additionalProperties: true is completely ambiguous without guidance on allowed keys or value types. The description adds no value beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Update' and the resource 'template', making the primary action obvious. However, it does not differentiate from sibling tools like template_create or template_duplicate, nor does it specify which attributes can be updated, so it lacks some distinction.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. With many sibling tools for CRUD operations and other update tools, the agent has no contextual hints about prerequisites, common use cases, or when not to use it.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.