verify_apk_signature
Check the signature of an APK file to confirm its authenticity and detect tampering.
Instructions
Verify the signature of an APK file
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| apkPath | Yes | Path to the APK file to verify |
Check the signature of an APK file to confirm its authenticity and detect tampering.
Verify the signature of an APK file
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| apkPath | Yes | Path to the APK file to verify |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided. The description does not disclose what the verification checks (e.g., against a keystore), prerequisites, side effects, or whether it is read-only. Minimal behavioral context beyond the basic action.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
One sentence, no waste, but too minimal to convey useful context. Could be expanded without losing conciseness.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
No output schema, no annotations, and only one parameter. The description omits crucial details like what the verification returns (success/failure, signer info) and error conditions.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents the single parameter. The tool description adds no additional meaning beyond what the parameter description provides.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the verb 'verify' and the resource 'APK signature'. It distinguishes from sibling tools like 'sign_apk' and keystore management tools.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, such as whether to use it before or after signing, or how it differs from verification via other means.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/OdellMoreno/uber-apk-signer-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server