Odoo Worker & Memory Tuner

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

There are no annotations, so the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It only states the action ('tune') without explaining whether it modifies the file in place, outputs values, or requires permissions. The mention of 'workers and memory limits' gives a slight hint but is insufficient.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is one short sentence, which is concise in length but severely under-specified for a tool with 7 parameters. It lacks necessary details, making it more of an under-specification than an appropriately sized description.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With 7 parameters, no annotations, no output schema, and 0% schema description coverage, this tool demands rich context. The description provides no information about the expected output, how inputs are used, or what 'tuning' entails, making it incomplete for an agent to use correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description had to compensate by explaining parameters. It does not mention any of the 7 parameters (profile, version, cpuCores, etc.) or their meanings. The only hint, 'workers and memory limits', is too vague to understand the role of parameters like concurrentUsers or sharedWithPostgres.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's function with a specific verb 'Tune' and a specific resource 'odoo.conf workers and memory limits'. This distinguishes it from the sibling tools, which are primarily calculators and selectors, making the purpose unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, no exclusions, and no prerequisites. It does not mention any context or scenarios, leaving the agent without direction on selection criteria.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.