delete-user
Deletes a user from a specific Keycloak realm by providing the realm name and user ID.
Instructions
Delete a user from a specific realm
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| realm | Yes | Realm name | |
| userId | Yes | User ID to delete |
Deletes a user from a specific Keycloak realm by providing the realm name and user ID.
Delete a user from a specific realm
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| realm | Yes | Realm name | |
| userId | Yes | User ID to delete |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
The description lacks details on behavior such as irreversibility, error handling (e.g., if user not found), or side effects on related data (e.g., sessions). Annotations are absent, so the description carries the full burden, which it does not meet.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
A single, efficient sentence that conveys the core purpose without superfluous words.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the tool's destructive nature and absence of output schema or annotations, the description is insufficient. It omits critical context such as success/failure behavior, error conditions, and whether the action rolls back related data.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100%, with 'realm' and 'userId' already clearly described. The description adds no extra semantic context beyond what the schema provides.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action (delete), the resource (user), and the scope (from a specific realm), distinguishing it from sibling tools like create-user and list-users.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool, prerequisites, or alternatives. For instance, it does not indicate that the user must exist or that permissions are required.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Octodet/keycloak-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server