Skip to main content
Glama
Octav-Labs

Octav API MCP Server

Official
by Octav-Labs

Related Servers

Alternatives to Octav API MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server that provides live crypto portfolio data, token info, gas prices, swap offers, and Bitcoin balance via Zerion and Blockstream APIs.
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Cryptocurrency MCP Server! Free! This powerful tool is designed for blockchain enthusiasts, providing comprehensive, real-time cryptocurrency information at your fingertips. Whether you're an experienced trader or just starting your journey into the crypto world.
      16
      3
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for accessing crypto token data from the Artemis API, including price, fees, revenue, asset classifications, and market cap rankings.
      -

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 32 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools target distinct resources and actions, and descriptions clarify overlapping portfolio variants such as wallet-only vs full portfolio vs agent-payment versions. Some tools still cluster around portfolio retrieval (octav_get_portfolio, octav_agent_portfolio, octav_get_virtual_users_portfolio, octav_get_wallet, octav_agent_wallet), but the boundaries are mostly explained.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Names consistently use the octav_ prefix and snake_case, with a predictable verb_noun pattern for most operations. Minor deviations like octav_agent_wallet and octav_agent_portfolio omit an explicit verb, and some names use adjective/resource forms, but the set remains readable and coherent.

    Tool Count2/5

    At 32 tools, the surface is very large for an MCP server and exceeds the manageable range even for a broad API. Many niche variants (agent-payment tools, virtual users, airdrop, Polymarket, block-level portfolio) could likely be consolidated or separated to reduce selection burden.

    Completeness4/5

    Coverage is strong across the apparent domain: address book and bundles have lifecycle operations, portfolios have multiple analytical views, and transactions, chains, protocols, approvals, credits, and sync status are exposed. Minor gaps exist, such as no transaction-detail tool and limited virtual-user management beyond listing and portfolio retrieval, but core workflows are covered.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues