clarity-mcp-multi
Related Servers
Alternatives to clarity-mcp-multi
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceLocal-first CLI + proxy that curates your MCP servers per client from one canonical config, cutting tool-schema tokens ~80% and resolving secret references instead of hardcoding keys.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables multi-AI collaborative analysis by proxying requests to existing login-based MCP servers (Gemini CLI and Codex CLI) from Claude Desktop or Claude Code.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceUnifies local MCP servers into a single secure Cloudflare Tunnel endpoint, making them accessible to MCP clients like Notion and Claude. Supports HTTP/SSE/stdio servers, built-in file system tools, bearer authentication, and one-click Windows setup.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceLocal, open-source multi-account MCP broker — one endpoint, every account. Add credentials once and switch identity without reconnecting, from any LLM client.9MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceA minimal multi-sub-account MCP proxy for GoHighLevel that allows listing configured accounts and making authenticated REST API calls on behalf of any account.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceActs as a secure OAuth 2.0/2.1 proxy gateway for MCP servers, enabling integration with Claude and ChatGPT platforms.8 npmMIT
TDQS
Scored across 5 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: client management (list/set active) vs. data retrieval (session recordings, analytics queries, documentation). No overlap.
Tools are named in two languages (Italian and English) and use different conventions: clarity_clienti and clarity_usa_cliente use snake_case and Italian, while the others use hyphens and English. This inconsistency can confuse agents.
5 tools is a reasonable number for a Clarity-focused server, covering client selection, recordings, analytics, and documentation without being excessive.
Covers core workflows (client management, listing recordings, analytics queries, documentation) but lacks detailed session drill-down or export capabilities, which are notable gaps.