Skip to main content
Glama
OL486

notes-mcp

by OL486

Related Servers

Alternatives to notes-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to interact with a local folder of Markdown notes, supporting listing, reading, searching, creating, and appending to notes with strict security boundaries.
      5
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A read-only toolkit for searching and analyzing Markdown note directories and Obsidian vaults through AI clients. It enables metadata extraction, full-text search, and natural language querying of note content, tags, and backlinks.
      10 npm
      4
      AGPL 3.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Gives AI agents fast, read-only access to a local knowledge base of Markdown notes and other text documents via a SQLite full-text index. Enables ranked section-level search, reading whole notes or single sections, heading outlines, note listing, and link/backlink navigation without slow disk walks.
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides controlled, read-only or write-enabled access to a private local Yaps Markdown vault, enabling AI clients to search, read, and manage notes securely.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides tools, resources, and prompts for managing a local Markdown notes database, including create, read, update, delete, search, and statistics operations, with robust path traversal protection.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct role: search_notes returns snippets, read_note returns full content, list_recent lists recently modified notes, and notes_stats summarizes corpus metadata. The descriptions explicitly clarify boundaries, especially search versus read.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Three tools follow a verb_object pattern (search_notes, read_note, list_recent), while notes_stats is noun_noun. The deviation is minor and still readable, but it breaks strict consistency.

    Tool Count5/5

    Four tools are well-scoped for a focused notes retrieval server. Each tool earns its place and covers a distinct query pattern without bloat.

    Completeness3/5

    The read-only surface covers search, full read, recent listing, and stats, but there are no create, update, append, or delete operations. For a notes server, this is a notable gap if agents are expected to manage notes rather than only inspect them.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues