Skip to main content
Glama
OHNLP

OMOP MCP Server

by OHNLP
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to OMOP MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • FHIR MCP Server

      maheshbalan
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for FHIR interoperability, enabling natural language querying and manipulation of clinical data with full CRUD operations, semantic search, and RAG capabilities.
      13
      MIT

    • NIH UMLS MCP Server

      feordin
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that provides access to the NIH UMLS API and the NIH VSAC FHIR API. This server enables AI models to search medical terminology, look up concept definitions, explore relationships between medical concepts, map codes between different medical coding systems, and work with curated clinical value sets.
      1
      MIT

    • MedBridge

      MYASHWANTHREDDY
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server that gives LLMs live access to clinical trials, FDA drug recalls, adverse-event reports, drug labels, and drug-name normalization via six validated tools.
      6
      MIT

    • PubMed Advanced MCP Server

      SuyashEkhande
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      This MCP server provides 16 intelligent tools for searching, retrieving, and linking biomedical literature from PubMed and PMC. It enables LLM applications to perform complex queries, batch processing, and cross-database linking.
      16
      8
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.3/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: one handles single keyword lookup, the other processes CSV files in batch. There is no overlap or ambiguity.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both tool names follow a consistent snake_case pattern with descriptive verbs (find, batch_map) and nouns (concept, concepts from CSV), making them predictable.

    Tool Count3/5

    With only 2 tools, the set feels thin even for a narrow domain. While it covers the core mapping function, a few more tools (e.g., get concept details) would make it more robust.

    Completeness3/5

    The tools cover single and batch mapping, which are the primary use cases. However, missing operations like retrieving concept details or filtering by domain leave minor gaps for advanced workflows.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive

    Resources