Skip to main content
Glama
ODATANO

@odatano/nightgate-mcp

Official
by ODATANO

Related Servers

Alternatives to @odatano/nightgate-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server for AI agent guardrails — validates and signs agent decisions (OAA tokens) so third parties can verify them without server access
      3
      26 PyPI
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for AI agent identity — verify agents with Ed25519 signatures, check trust scores, sign and verify content, exchange encrypted messages. Built on the Agent Identity Protocol (AIP).
      8
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to manage identity, permissions, secrets, and verifiable proofs through a hosted MCP server, letting clients sign in and check what an agent may do before it acts.
      15
      27 npm
      Apache 2.0

    TDQS

    A4/5.0

    Scored across 28 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    The set covers several broad domains and most tools have distinct purposes, but there is meaningful overlap between board/offer reading tools (get_swap_offer vs read_swap_offer), swap lifecycle tools, and transaction-building/submitting/sponsoring variants. The very long descriptions help, but an agent can still hesitate between submit_vault_call, build_sponsorable_transaction, call_contract, and anchor_document for related attestation/contract work.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tool names follow a predictable snake_case verb_noun pattern such as get_swap_wallet, build_swap_offer, post_swap_offer, verify_attestation, and prepare_document_proof. Minor deviations like my_swap_offers and read_swap_offer are readable but slightly break the pattern.

    Tool Count3/5

    The server genuinely spans attestation, ZK predicates, shielded swaps, token minting/burning/transfers, sponsoring, and contract calls, so many tools are justified. However, 28 tools is heavy, and the ten or so swap-related tools plus multiple sponsoring/build abstractions make the surface feel larger than necessary.

    Completeness4/5

    Coverage is strong: swaps have build/read/post/list/get/take/sponsor/retire/revert lifecycle tools, attestation has prepare/anchor/verify/prove operations, and token and sponsoring flows are well represented. Minor gaps include no obvious way to list or enumerate all attestations and no generic job-status/query tool beyond result payloads.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive