list_profiles

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description discloses that profiles never include passwords, which is a key safety trait. However, it lacks other behavioral details such as whether it is read-only, if it requires an active connection, or the format of returned data. Without annotations, the description could be more transparent.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, front-loaded with the purpose and a critical safety detail. Every sentence earns its place; no wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple list tool with no parameters and no output schema, the description is adequate but not complete. It does not specify what fields or properties are included in the profile list, nor any prerequisites for using the tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool has zero parameters, and schema coverage is trivially 100%. According to the rubric, baseline for 0 parameters is 4. The description does not need to add parameter info, and its safety note adds some value beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool lists saved SSH connection profiles, using a specific verb ('list') and resource. It distinguishes from sibling tools like delete_profile or set_default_profile by noting that profiles never include passwords.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as delete_profile or set_default_profile. The description only states what it does, without any when-to-use or when-not-to-use context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.