Skip to main content
Glama

backup_first

Create a pre-flight snapshot of your Spotify library before destructive changes, saving file path and item counts for later restore. Protect your library with a reversible backup.

Instructions

Create a pre-flight library snapshot before a destructive operation. Returns snapshot file path and counts for later restore. Read-only against Spotify.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
notesNoFree-text note for the snapshot
response_formatNo'concise' = human prose, 'detailed' = more fields in prose, 'json' = raw API objectconcise

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changedv1.28.0
    • addedInput schema / properties / response_format
      Added value: +{
      +  "default": "concise",
      +  "description": "'concise' = human prose, 'detailed' = more fields in prose, 'json' = raw API object",
      +  "enum": [
      +    "concise",
      +    "detailed",
      +    "json"
      +  ],
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
  2. Addedv1.26.1

TDQS

A4/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the behavioral burden. It does disclose that the tool is read-only against Spotify and that it returns a snapshot file path and counts for later restore. However, it does not describe what exactly is snapshotted, whether the snapshot persists, or any other side effects beyond creating the snapshot.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is short and well-structured: it states the purpose in the first sentence, the return value in the second, and the key behavioral constraint in the third. Every sentence earns its place with no redundant information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool has only two optional parameters and no output schema, and the description sufficiently explains the tool's purpose and return value. It does not over-promise or omit critical calling context. A note about which snapshot format or restore mechanism to pair with it would improve completeness, but the current level is adequate.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the parameters notes and response_format are already documented. The description adds no additional parameter semantics beyond the schema, which is acceptable given the baseline for full coverage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly identifies the action: create a pre-flight library snapshot before a destructive operation. It also distinguishes this tool from generic backup tools by emphasizing the pre-flight, restore-oriented intent. The phrase 'read-only against Spotify' adds an important scope distinction.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explicitly states when to use this tool: 'before a destructive operation.' It implies this is a safety/preparation step and notes the read-only nature against Spotify. However, it does not explicitly name alternative tools or describe when not to use it.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools