Skip to main content
Glama
Nothflare

gaslighting-mcp

by Nothflare

Related Servers

Alternatives to gaslighting-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A zero-config web search and fetch MCP server for LLM agents, featuring multi-backend metasearch, persistent rolling cache, and structured error envelopes for retry-friendly interactions.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A self-contained web-research MCP server that lets local LLM agents search, fetch, and synthesize web content using tools like web_search, web_fetch, and web_research.
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Semantic web search MCP server that navigates the live web using a cheap LLM and local embeddings, caching results for fast responses to similar queries without relying on general search engines.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A free and unlimited web search server that enables AI models to search, crawl, and research web content using DuckDuckGo without requiring API keys. It features parallel crawling and a smart ranking system to prioritize the most relevant information for complex queries.
      87 npm
      4
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A zero-config MCP server that lets AI agents fetch, read, and search live web pages without API keys or databases, using in-process BM25 retrieval.
      31 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for local semantic search over web content, enabling AI agents to ingest, index, and query pages with hybrid retrieval and token budget control.
      4
      GPL 2.0

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: read_url fetches and converts a specific webpage to markdown, while search performs a broader web query and returns multiple results. There is no overlap in functionality, making tool selection unambiguous.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both tools follow a consistent verb-based naming pattern (read_url, search) with clear, simple names that accurately describe their actions. There are no deviations or mixed conventions.

    Tool Count2/5

    With only two tools, the server feels thin for a web-related domain that typically requires more operations (e.g., filtering, summarization, or advanced search). While the tools cover basic fetch and search, the scope is minimal and lacks depth.

    Completeness2/5

    For a web interaction server, there are significant gaps: no ability to interact with page elements, handle authentication, filter search results, or perform actions like posting or updating. The tools provide only basic read and search, leaving many common web tasks uncovered.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues