PrusaMCP
Related Servers
Alternatives to PrusaMCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseBqualityAmaintenanceEnables interaction with 3D printer management systems through an MCP server, supporting STL file manipulation, slicing, and control of printers like OctoPrint, Klipper, Duet, and more.30393 npm243GPL 2.0
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for pre-print QA of Bambu Studio projects, providing tools to inspect models and 3MF files, validate risky settings, create support variants, and open files in Bambu Studio.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceAn MCP server that enables AI assistants to control and monitor Klipper 3D printers via the Moonraker API. It supports comprehensive printer management, including G-code execution, toolchanger operations, and real-time status monitoring.25-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for generating print-ready 3D models from text descriptions via a multi-agent pipeline, enabling AI assistants to create and optimize STL files.1MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI agents to interact with OrcaSlicer to manage profiles, adjust printing settings, and perform slicing operations. It allows users to search settings, slice STL/3MF files, and analyze G-code metadata through natural language assistants.7AGPL 3.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceExposes MCP tools that slice models with headless OrcaSlicer, stage gcode on Moonraker-based Klipper printers, gate job starts behind explicit operator authorization, and report status, telemetry-derived events, snapshots, and alerts. It also manages spools and lets AI agents query job estimates, blockers, and start-precondition checks.Apache 2.0
TDQS
Scored across 17 tools
Most tools have distinct purposes, but there is some overlap between analyze_mesh and check_printability, which both analyze 3D models for issues, potentially causing confusion. However, their descriptions differentiate them slightly: analyze_mesh focuses on geometric properties, while check_printability assesses printability problems. Other tools like diagnose_print and print_wizard are clearly distinct in their post-print and comprehensive analysis roles, respectively.
Tool names follow a consistent snake_case pattern throughout, which is good. However, there is minor inconsistency in verb usage: some tools use action-oriented verbs like analyze, check, diagnose, while others use more descriptive terms like suggest_orientation or generate_prusaslicer_config. This deviation is slight and does not significantly hinder readability, but it prevents a perfect score.
With 17 tools, the count is on the higher side but reasonable for a comprehensive 3D printing assistant server covering mesh analysis, slicing, printing, and feedback. It feels slightly heavy but not excessive, as each tool appears to serve a specific function in the workflow, from pre-print analysis to post-print diagnostics and community sharing.
The tool set provides complete coverage of the 3D printing domain, including pre-print analysis (e.g., analyze_mesh, check_printability), slicing (slice_prusaslicer), configuration (generate_prusaslicer_config), printing (upload_print), post-print feedback (submit_feedback, diagnose_print), and community features (export_feedback, feedback_stats). There are no obvious gaps; agents can handle the full lifecycle from model preparation to print completion and review.