Skip to main content
Glama
Noosbai

PrusaMCP

by Noosbai
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to PrusaMCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • MCP 3D Printer Server

      DMontgomery40
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables interaction with 3D printer management systems through an MCP server, supporting STL file manipulation, slicing, and control of printers like OctoPrint, Klipper, Duet, and more.
      62 npm
      231
      GPL 2.0

    • Bambu Project QA MCP

      gauravsoodtech
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for pre-print QA of Bambu Studio projects, providing tools to inspect models and 3MF files, validate risky settings, create support variants, and open files in Bambu Studio.
      -

    • Klipper MCP Server

      Charleslotto
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables AI assistants to control and monitor Klipper 3D printers via the Moonraker API. It supports comprehensive printer management, including G-code execution, toolchanger operations, and real-time status monitoring.
      22
      -

    • fabtally-mcp

      zvmzaretsky
      F
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for real FDM 3D-printing slicing, quoting, and design-for-manufacturability analysis via the FabTally API, supporting 12 printer profiles and 12 materials. Includes free discovery/printability tools and paid slice/quote/orientation tools settled via x402 (USDC on Base).
      6
      -
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 17 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have distinct purposes, but there is some overlap between analyze_mesh and check_printability, which both analyze 3D models for issues, potentially causing confusion. However, their descriptions differentiate them slightly: analyze_mesh focuses on geometric properties, while check_printability assesses printability problems. Other tools like diagnose_print and print_wizard are clearly distinct in their post-print and comprehensive analysis roles, respectively.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Tool names follow a consistent snake_case pattern throughout, which is good. However, there is minor inconsistency in verb usage: some tools use action-oriented verbs like analyze, check, diagnose, while others use more descriptive terms like suggest_orientation or generate_prusaslicer_config. This deviation is slight and does not significantly hinder readability, but it prevents a perfect score.

    Tool Count4/5

    With 17 tools, the count is on the higher side but reasonable for a comprehensive 3D printing assistant server covering mesh analysis, slicing, printing, and feedback. It feels slightly heavy but not excessive, as each tool appears to serve a specific function in the workflow, from pre-print analysis to post-print diagnostics and community sharing.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool set provides complete coverage of the 3D printing domain, including pre-print analysis (e.g., analyze_mesh, check_printability), slicing (slice_prusaslicer), configuration (generate_prusaslicer_config), printing (upload_print), post-print feedback (submit_feedback, diagnose_print), and community features (export_feedback, feedback_stats). There are no obvious gaps; agents can handle the full lifecycle from model preparation to print completion and review.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources