Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to Arc Agents MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to discover and pay per call in USDC over x402 for Arc market search, token intelligence, price candles, wallet and trade data, swap quotes, and routed third-party agents, with spending caps and budget limits. Paid tools reserve their price in a local ledger before signing, return unsigned transactions, and refund automatically when a routed seller fails.
      8
      268 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to access crypto market data such as prices, extreme funding rates, and briefs through MCP tools, with paid calls settled in USDC on Base via x402.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to launch tokens, trade, claim creator fees, manage locks, recover projects, and perform on-chain reads on Arc mainnet through 19 prepare/execute/read tools plus optional shared asset tools.
      41 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that bridges ERC-8004 agent identity, reputation, and validation registries into tool calls, enabling discovery, inspection, and verification of on-chain AI agents from any MCP client.
      8
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables MCP-capable AI agents to make pay-per-call Solana data requests (snapshots, risk checks, token reports, health, balances, transactions, trending pairs) with automatic USDC settlement over x402.
      5
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.1/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    With a single tool there is no possibility of tool misselection; an agent cannot confuse it with anything else. The tool's purpose (fetch ERC-8004 agent data by ID) is unambiguous and clearly scoped.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    The lone name get_agent_data follows a clean snake_case verb_noun convention consistent with the parameter naming (agentId). There is no mixed convention to cause confusion.

    Tool Count3/5

    One tool is defensible for a narrow, paid single-endpoint data API, and the tool is a rich composite rather than trivial. However, a one-tool surface for a server branded around 'Agents' feels thin and leaves no room for companion operations like listing or discovery.

    Completeness3/5

    For a known agent ID, the fetch is comprehensive (identity, metadata, reputation, validation, explorer links). The surface has no enumeration or search path, so an agent that does not already know the token ID hits a dead end.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo recent community issues