Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to shotcut-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI clients to create, edit, validate, preview, and render Shotcut projects (saved as MLT XML) without operating the GUI, using structured timeline editing tools and local safety mechanisms.
      24
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables agents to create, inspect and edit Kdenlive project files, import and relink media, query installed MLT effects/transitions, author subtitles, and run asynchronous MLT renders, plus drive the live Kdenlive editor UI. Edits always write new files, and rendering is job-based with verification of the output.
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents and MCP clients to programmatically edit video projects on a local desktop editor, with 119 tools for multitrack editing, effects, captions, audio, and batch auto-editing, producing reviewable and reversible real timeline edits.
      AGPL 3.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to edit video locally through FFmpeg: probing media, validating and previewing JSON edit projects, rendering short-form clips with captions, reframing, transitions and ducked music. Also analyses existing videos and applies or saves reusable format templates, without cloud services or API keys.
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that gives AI agents a stateful multi-track video editor powered by MLT, enabling them to assemble timelines, add media and text, apply filters and transforms, preview downscaled frames, and render final videos to disk.
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 14 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools target clearly different actions on the timeline (add, trim, move, split, filter, transition, render). A few pairs could still be confused: remove_clip vs remove_segment, and project_info vs get_timeline both return overlapping project/timeline data.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Almost all tools follow a verb_noun pattern (create_project, add_clip, trim_clip, apply_filter, get_timeline). The exceptions are project_info (noun phrase) and render (bare verb), which are minor deviations but readable.

    Tool Count5/5

    14 tools is well within the ideal 3-15 range for a focused video-editing server. Each tool represents a meaningful editing operation, and there are no redundant or trivial tools.

    Completeness3/5

    Core clip editing, filters, transitions, timeline inspection, and rendering are covered. However, there is no explicit open_project/load_project tool to continue editing an existing .mlt file, no delete_project, and no way to update project-level settings, creating a notable lifecycle gap.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues