Skip to main content
Glama
No-Compromise-AI

glm-mcp

by No-Compromise-AI
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to glm-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • CCGLM MCP Server

      nosolosoft
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables Claude Code (Anthropic Sonnet) to invoke Z.AI's GLM-4.6 model through a secondary Claude instance. Supports code generation, deep analysis, and general queries while maintaining file tracking and secure token management.
      1
      -

    • GLM Subagent MCP

      djerok
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables Claude Code to use GLM (Zhipu) as a cheap, full-capability subagent for file editing, code generation, and bash commands, with automatic routing between Opus and GLM based on task complexity.
      4
      3
      MIT

    • Ollama MCP Server

      JMRussas
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Exposes local Ollama instances as tools for Claude Code, allowing users to offload code generation, text drafting, and embedding tasks to local GPUs. It supports multi-turn conversations and model management through the Model Context Protocol.
      MIT

    • Zen MCP Server

      199-biotechnologies
      -
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      Gives Claude access to multiple AI models (Gemini, OpenAI, OpenRouter, Ollama) for enhanced development capabilities including extended reasoning, collaborative development, code review, and advanced debugging.
      -
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.4/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    glm_ask and glm_review both send prompts to GLM, which could cause some overlap, but glm_review's strict VERDICT format and diff/spec input make its purpose clearly distinct. glm_models is wholly separate.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    glm_ask and glm_review follow a consistent verb-first pattern, while glm_models breaks it by using a noun instead of a verb like list_models. Minor deviation, but the prefix keeps the family recognizable.

    Tool Count5/5

    Three tools is within the ideal 3-15 range and each tool earns its place: one for general prompting, one for structured review, and one for model discovery. The scope is tightly focused.

    Completeness5/5

    For a GLM-oriented server, the surface covers the core needs: asking questions, reviewing changes against a spec, and listing available models. No obvious dead ends or missing operations within the stated purpose.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessResponsive

    Resources