A
licenseNot graded
qualityC
maintenanceMCP server for multi-agent travel planning, orchestrating parallel expert calls to generate structured itineraries and persist them to SQLite.
MIT
Trip Planner
by Nirmai3799
Related Servers
Alternatives to Trip Planner
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that orchestrates parallel searches for flights, hotels, and activities to generate travel itineraries. It features persistent state management via LangGraph and SQLite while ensuring the total cost remains within a specified budget.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server that turns planning documents into structured SQLite data and exposes plan metadata to AI agents, with tools to list and delete saved plans.-
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceWanderlog-mcp is an MCP server that lets LLM agents plan and edit Wanderlog trip itineraries — adding places, hotels, notes, and checklists to any day, managing trip dates, and searching for destinations. It turns a conversational prompt into a fully built-out travel itinerary with practical details interleaved between each stop.18170 npm132MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for travel-planning agents to create and manage concise Markdown briefs and validated structured trip documents, without booking or altering travel.MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for agentic travel recommendations, exposing tools to retrieve member profiles and personalized travel recommendations with partner-specific rules and policies.-
TDQS
A4.3/5.0
Scored across 3 tools
Disambiguation5/5
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: reading the itinerary, adding an activity, and removing an activity. There is no overlap or ambiguity between them.
Naming Consistency5/5
All tool names follow the same verb_noun pattern with snake_case: get_itinerary, add_activity, remove_activity. This is fully consistent and predictable.
Tool Count5/5
Three tools is well-scoped for a simple trip planner. Each tool earns its place, and the count is neither too thin nor excessive for the apparent purpose.
Completeness4/5
The set covers the core lifecycle of reading, adding, and removing activities. The only minor gap is the lack of an update operation, but this can be worked around with remove_activity followed by add_activity.
Maintenance
ActivitySlowing
ResponsivenessNo issues