Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to AgentDock

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables ChatGPT Developer Mode to operate as a local coding agent by connecting to your own repository through MCP, allowing it to read, write, search, edit files, run safe verification commands, and manage handoff context for continued work.
      15
      313 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables ChatGPT and other MCP clients to browse, search, edit and upload files, run commands and interactive terminals, inspect Git history and worktrees, dispatch coding agents, and install composable plugins within locally registered workspaces. Requests execute under the user's own machine with per-request approval or auto-approval, keeping files, tasks and results local unless explicitly returned.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables ChatGPT to operate authorized local projects through MCP, including reading and modifying code, viewing Git changes, running configured programs, and reading local Codex sessions to continue work.
      0
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables ChatGPT to read and edit local project files, inspect Git changes, and run approved development scripts through a secure MCP tunnel, with optional Codex Desktop integration.
      177 npm
      2
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Remote MCP coding bridge that gives ChatGPT/Codex secure local workspace access, including file retrieval, semantic code intelligence, Git, diagnostics, and guarded shell execution.
      32 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 22 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools target distinct operations—workspace management, file read/write/edit, image inspection, and change review—with descriptions that explicitly separate them. The main sources of ambiguity are the generic local-workspace-bridge wrapper, which can call other tools indirectly, and the write/edit/apply_patch cluster, though their intended use cases are clarified.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The vast majority of tools follow a clear verb_noun snake_case pattern like open_workspace, read_image, and show_changes. The hyphenated local-workspace-bridge and the single-word bash/tree are noticeable outliers, but they are isolated deviations rather than a systematic mixing of conventions.

    Tool Count3/5

    22 tools is on the heavy side and exceeds the typical 3–15 tool sweet spot. The count is somewhat justified by the broad scope—workspace lifecycles, file editing, image handling, diagnostics, and verification—but it still feels like more surface area than necessary.

    Completeness4/5

    The toolset covers workspace open/list/close/default management, file tree/search/read/write/edit/apply_patch, image inspection and cropping, bash verification, change summarization, skills, and self-test/config. Obvious gaps like an explicit delete/rename tool or git commit are absent, but apply_patch can handle file deletion and the remaining gaps are workable.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues