zyxel_disconnect
Disconnects the active SSH session from the Zyxel switch. Close the connection after finishing network management tasks.
Instructions
Disconnect from the Zyxel switch
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Disconnects the active SSH session from the Zyxel switch. Close the connection after finishing network management tasks.
Disconnect from the Zyxel switch
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description carries full burden but provides no behavioral details (e.g., idempotency, prerequisite of a connection, effects of disconnecting).
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is extremely concise (4 words) and front-loaded with the core action. No unnecessary words.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
While the tool is simple with no parameters or output schema, the description lacks context about usage flow (e.g., require prior connection, safe to call multiple times). It is adequate but not complete.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
There are no parameters, and schema coverage is 100%. The description adds no parameter meaning, but this is acceptable since none exist. Baseline of 4 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action ('Disconnect') and the target resource ('Zyxel switch'). It distinguishes this tool from siblings like zyxel_connect and zyxel_connection_status.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. For example, it does not mention that it should be used after connecting or to end a session.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Nino6689/zyxel-mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server