get_privacy_info

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It states what the tool does but lacks behavioral details such as rate limits, authentication requirements, error handling, or whether it performs external API calls. It doesn't disclose any operational constraints beyond the basic functionality.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is front-loaded with the core purpose in the first sentence, followed by structured sections for Args and Returns. Every sentence adds value without redundancy, making it efficient and easy to parse.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has an output schema (which covers return values) and a simple input schema with one parameter, the description provides sufficient context for basic use. However, as a detection tool with no annotations, it could benefit from more behavioral details like accuracy notes or limitations.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description adds meaningful context for the single parameter 'ip' by specifying it's 'IP address to check,' which clarifies its purpose beyond the schema's basic type. With 0% schema description coverage and only one parameter, this compensates adequately, though it doesn't detail format constraints like IPv4 vs. IPv6.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the specific action ('Detect privacy services') and resource ('for an IP address'), distinguishing it from sibling tools like get_ip_info or get_ip_location that focus on different IP attributes. It explicitly lists the types of privacy services detected (VPN, proxy, Tor, relay, hosting).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage context through 'privacy services detection,' suggesting it's for identifying anonymization services, but it doesn't explicitly state when to use this tool versus alternatives like get_ip_info or other sibling tools. No exclusions or prerequisites are mentioned.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.